The NACTT Academy offers a comprehensive community for bankruptcy professionals seeking to advance their education in consumer bankruptcy.
ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
Critical Case Comment
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Chapter 13 Trustee, Nashville, TN
In re Heinzle, 2014 WL 244226 (Bankr. W.D. Tex. May 30, 2014)
Where debtors have made all payments to the Trustee as required by their plan but failed to maintain “conduit” payments to the mortgage creditor, the debtors did not make all payments under their plan and their case should be dismissed. (Gargotta)
Case Summary
The Heinzles filed their Chapter 13 bankruptcy in October of 2008 proposing a plan in which they would make payments to the Trustee for the purpose of curing . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
Assessing the Ailing Business Post Pandemic
Ask Ms. Ps & Qs
Lawyers are People Too: An Interview with Aki Koyama, Staff Attorney to Chapter 13 Standing Trustee Kathy Dockery
9th Circuit BAP: Actually, Absolute Right to Dismiss Means Absolute
The Kill Switch and The Stay
Meet an AO Trustee
FROM THE ARCHIVES: If You’re Gonna Bet the Farm, Maybe Play Against the House
Still Trying to Apply Taggart: Fourth Circuit Vacates Beckhart v. Newrez, LLC
District of South Carolina
Critical Case Comment–Who is Responsible to Address Eligibility Questions?