The NACTT Academy offers a comprehensive community for bankruptcy professionals seeking to advance their education in consumer bankruptcy.
ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
Critical Case Comment: Bourff v Rubin Lublin
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Chapter 13 Trustee for the Middle District of TN
Bourff v Rubin Lublin, LLC, 2012 WL 971800 (Eleventh Cir, March 15, 2012) (Per Curiam)
A law firm, filing a debt verification letter to a consumer to collect on a mortgage obligation, violates the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act when it wrongly identifies the default servicer as the “creditor” in the communication.
Case Summary
Mr. Bourff borrowed $195,000 from America’s Wholesale Lender which debt was secured by real property. When he failed to make payment on . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
The Student Loan Solution
Deconstructing the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act: Obduskey Says Lawyers Conducting Nonjudicial Foreclosure Are Not “Debt Collectors”
An Open Thank You Letter to NACTT – Reflections from a New(er) Trustee: My First Two Years
Critical Case Comment– Absolute Right to Dismiss But Not the End of the Story
From the Editor
Word to the Wise: Failure to Properly Notice a Creditor Is Bad!
The Smart Way to Cut Out the IRS
Is 1328(i) Ultimately Terrible for Debtors?
These Summer Activities Can Affect Next Year’s Tax Returns
Passive Retention: A Creditor’s Right or an Act to Exercise Control?