By Cathy Moran, Esq., Moran Law Group (Redwood City, CA) For Californians, the CA Supreme Court’s decision in Brace this summer upended our understanding of joint tenancy and community property. For decades, we “knew” that a property couldn’t be . . . It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members. Join...
From the Editor
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By Wm. Houston Brown, United States Bankruptcy Judge (Retired)
Confirmation - Debtors could not deduct ownership costs for vehicle secured by non-purchase money lien. The above-median debtors claimed ownership deduction of $497 from projected disposable income, when the title loan payments on the vehicle were only $66.67. The difference in these amounts meant unsecured creditors could receive $25,819.80 over the 60-month plan, and the trustee objected to confirmation. Reviewing In re Ransom, 562 U.S. 61 (2011), for “what constituted an applicable vehicle ownership expense under the IRS Local . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or sign in below:
Related Articles
Why Your Bankruptcy Client Doesn’t Understand You (And How to Fix the Problem)
Demystifying Bankruptcy Appeals
From the Editor – Avoidance
New Academy Podcasts
From the Editor
Tax Tips for Taxpayers to Consider When Selling Their Home
Ask Ms. Ps and Qs
Sugar’s Soured Misstep Equals Sanctions
Reflections on the Administration of Chapter 13 Bankruptcy: Progress and Concerns
Brace & Beyond: Joint Tenancy & Transmutation