Is 1328(i) Ultimately Terrible for Debtors?

By Ken Siomos, Staff Attorney for Marsha L. Combs-Skinner (Newman, IL)

The December 2020 Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021, more commonly known as the second covid-19 stimulus bill, contains a few bankruptcy related provisions, but none stood out more with respect to Chapter 13 than the newly created § 1328(i). This provision provides that a court may grant a full 1328(a) discharge to debtors in certain circumstancesi (emphasis added). Cathy Moran, Judge Lundin and Hank Hildebrand have all discussed the potentially broad implications of this subsection – theorizing they may . . .

It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.

Or sign in below:

No Author Biography has been linked to this Article.

Critical Case Comment–Sex, Lies and the Barton Doctrine

Henry E. Hildebrand, III

March 27, 2022

The issuance of a subpoena to a Chapter 7 trustee by a third party was subject to the Barton Doctrine and could not be permitted without the parties seeking bankruptcy court consent. (Clarkson) In re Eagan Avenatti, LLP, 2022 WL 630332 (Bankr. C.D. Cal. March 3, 2022) Case Summary Eagan Avenatti, LLP, was the California law firm of the somewhat...

Members

While Chapter 7 Filings Continue to Decline, Chapter 13 Filings are Trending Slightly Upward

Kevin R. Anderson

April 24, 2022

Recent headlines noted that March 2022 saw a 33.5% increase in bankruptcy filings over February. This could suggest the coming swell in bankruptcy cases anticipated since the start of the COVID pandemic. However, bankruptcy professionals recognize that consumer filings always spike in March (see chart). This phenomenon is usually attributed to the tendency to avoid filing in January and February...

Members

Critical Case Comment

August 1, 2021

By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Chapter 13 Standing Trustee (Nashville, TN) While the debtors failed to meet the high threshold to establish excusable neglect to permit their claim filed on behalf of a creditor after the bar date to be allowed, where a Chapter 13 case is dismissed and then reinstated prior to the expiration of the bar date, the...

Members

2022 Bankruptcy Procedure Year in Review: Revised Statute and Rules and Selected Cases – Part 7 Selected Decisions Under Parts I and II of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure

Lawrence R. Ahern, III

March 26, 2023

Introduction Amendments to 16 rules and new one new rule took effect December 1, 2022. Many reflected changes necessitated by the Small Business Reorganization Act of 2019 (SBRA),1 and had been in place in the same or similar form on an interim basis since that legislation took effect. Part 1 of this series summarized 2022 . . . It looks...

Members

Bankruptcy Court Strikes Back: Awarding $825,940.55 in Sanctions for Bad Faith Filing

M. Jonathan Hayes

March 24, 2024

Bankruptcy Court in Texas awards sanctions of $825,940.55 for bad faith filing and prosecution of a proof of claim. (Yes it’s an 11 but still, $825k!)

Members

Amended Rule 2002(a)(5) – Who Gets Served and Who Petitions the Court for Change?

November 22, 2020

By Phil Lamos, Chief Legal Counsel, Office of the Chapter 13 Trustee Lauren A. Helbling (Cleveland, OH) Bankruptcy Rule 2002(a)(5) directs that 21 days’ notice must be given of the “time fixed to accept or reject a proposed modification of a [Chapter 13] plan.” But to whom must notice be given? Specifically, which creditors need to be given notice? This...

Members

NDC Small Sponsorship Program

The Academy

May 3, 2026

The National Data Center provides small sponsorships of up to $2,000 for educational consumer bankruptcy seminars, when approved pursuant to its guidelines and when funds are available.

The Effect of “Success” (Or the Lack of It) on Attorneys’ Fees

Lawrence R. Ahern, III

September 18, 2022

Appendix A 1994 Revised Text of 11 U.S.C. § 330(a), with 2005's Minor Changes Highlighted(1994 version highlighted to show additions and deletions in 2005) (a)(1) After notice to the parties in interest and the United States Trustee and a hearing, and subject to sections 326, 328, and 329, the court may award to a trustee, a consumer privacy ombudsman appointed...

Members

Immunity Isn’t a Force Field

Henry E. Hildebrand, III

August 23, 2026

Quasi-judicial and derived immunity, enjoyed by a Chapter 7 trustee, is limited and will not automatically shield a Chapter 7 trustee from answering allegations of negligence.

Members

Guesswork Doesn’t Modify Plans

Henry E. Hildebrand, III

January 4, 2026

Modification of a confirmed Chapter 13 plan cannot be based on speculative, uncertain, and anticipated conditions; the “best interest of creditors test” is determined at the time of confirmation of the original plan and not the confirmation of a modified plan.

Members

Is 1328(i) Ultimately Terrible for Debtors?

Link to Post:

It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.

Or sign in below:

Related Articles

Critical Case Comment–Sex, Lies and the Barton Doctrine

While Chapter 7 Filings Continue to Decline, Chapter 13 Filings are Trending Slightly Upward

Critical Case Comment

2022 Bankruptcy Procedure Year in Review: Revised Statute and Rules and Selected Cases – Part 7 Selected Decisions Under Parts I and II of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure

Bankruptcy Court Strikes Back: Awarding $825,940.55 in Sanctions for Bad Faith Filing

Amended Rule 2002(a)(5) – Who Gets Served and Who Petitions the Court for Change?

NDC Small Sponsorship Program

The Effect of “Success” (Or the Lack of It) on Attorneys’ Fees

Immunity Isn’t a Force Field

Guesswork Doesn’t Modify Plans

Academy

Members

Website

Legal

Looking to Become a Member?

Webinars

Member Articles

Industry News

To get started, please let us know which of these best fits your current position: