The NACTT Academy offers a comprehensive community for bankruptcy professionals seeking to advance their education in consumer bankruptcy.
ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
Critical Case Comment: In re Reed
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Chapter 13 Trustee, Middle District of Tennessee
In re Reed, 2011 WL 3801859 (Bank. D.Or., Aug. 9, 2011) (Perris)
In the Ninth Circuit, when an above-median income Chapter 13 debtor has no (or negative) projected disposable income as calculated using the mechanical approach, there is no applicable commitment period for a debtor’s Chapter 13 plan, so the plan need not last five years.
Case Summary
The Reeds’ income exceeded Oregon’s median income for a family of their size, and their Chapter 13 plan . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
The First Thing a Chapter 13 Debtor’s Attorney Should Know About the Small Business Reorganization Act of 2019
2019 Legislation Affecting Bankruptcy Practice
Jan M. Sensenich
Passing of Sitting Chief Judge
Critical Case Comment
Critical Case Comment – The Now Infamous Castleman Case
Rollin’ Rollin’ Rollin’ – Whether a Motor Home Qualifies for the Homestead Exemption as a Mobile Home?
From the Editor – Confirmation
What’s It Worth to You?
What, Exactly, Is the Trustee’s Percentage Fee