By Lawrence R. Ahern, III, Brown & Ahern (Nashville, TN) Introduction As of April 16, 2020, more than 22,000,000 people in the United States were reported to have filed for unemployment aid, "a staggering loss of jobs that has wiped out a decade of employment gains and pushed families to line up at food banks as they await government help."1...
From the Editor – Confirmation
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired)
Equal monthly payments and attorney fees. The secured creditor objected to confirmation on basis that the plan improperly deferred its payments until debtor’s attorney fees were paid, and the District Court affirmed confirmation that delayed start of secured equal monthly payments for 21 months. The opinion examines three approaches to the issue: 1) Equal monthly payments must be “level once they begin” but that doesn’t require payments to be equal throughout life of plan or to begin at confirmation. See, e.g., In re DeSardi
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
From the Editor – Fair Debt Collection Practices Act
Engaging a Non-Profit to Solve the Chapter 13 Trustees PSLF Conundrum
Critical Case Comment– Absolute Right to Dismiss But Not the End of the Story
Is an Unemployment Compensation Payment Exempt?
Stop and Smell the . . . Well, Corn
Supreme Court Agrees to Revisit Finality of Orders in Bankruptcy
Critical Case Comment – You Might as Well Plan for the Wrecked Car
City of Chicago v. Fulton And the Turnover Conundrum
Did Congress Mean What It Said in Section 1328(i)?
Critical Case Comment