The NACTT Academy offers a comprehensive community for bankruptcy professionals seeking to advance their education in consumer bankruptcy.
ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
Getting To The Finish Line In Chapter 13
Print This Article
Link to Post:
Judge Mary Ann Whipple has served as a bankruptcy judge for the Northern District of Ohio, sitting in Toledo, since 2001, and has also served a term on the Sixth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel.
Chapter 13 cases are virtual legal marathons. Chapter 7 cases, and these days many chapter 11 cases, are sprints by comparison. A chapter 13 case is one of few court proceedings where the parties understand and intend from the outset that it will last for years.
The finish line for a chapter 13 debtor is usually a discharge under section 1328 of the . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
Arbitration in Bankruptcy: Reading Opinions & Tea Leaves in Recent Supreme Court & Lower Court Actions
Supreme Court Revisits Finality of Orders in Bankruptcy: Comment on Ritzen and Review of “Finality”
Ask Ms. Ps & Qs
New Trustee Named
Score One for the United States Bankruptcy Court in the Service of the African America Community[1]
Bankruptcy Court Broadly Interprets “Engaged in Business” Requirement for Subchapter V Eligibility
How to Manage Incompetent, Unprepared, and Unreasonable Creditor Bankruptcy Counsel
Retirement of the Honorable Guy R. Humphrey
Fond Farewell to Danny O’Brien
Critical Case Comment – 3002.1 and Reverse Mortgages