Bankruptcy Court Broadly Interprets “Engaged in Business” Requirement for Subchapter V Eligibility

By Lawrence R. Ahern, III, Brown & Ahern (Nashville, TN)

Introduction

The Bankruptcy Court for the District of Colorado ruled recently, in a case styled In re Ikalowych,1 that while eligibility for subchapter V of Chapter 112 requires that 50% of a debtor's debt must arise from commercial or business activities, the debtor was not required to be directly involved with those activities when he filed and elected to be governed by subchapter V, the part of Chapter . . .

It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.

Or sign in below:

No Author Biography has been linked to this Article.

In the Trenches: Secrets to Settlement – Competency in the Courtroom Part 3 of 3

June 23, 2019

By Jan Hamilton, Chapter 13 Trustee (Topeka, KS) Click here for Part 1 of 3 Click here for Part 2 of 3 19. In the Courtroom ― Leading Questions Learning how to conduct a direct examination of your witnesses is the cornerstone to your case. Early . . . It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This...

Members

Boundaries of Modification Include Death

Henry E. Hildebrand, III

January 11, 2026

Chapter 13 plan, confirmed to pay a 2% dividend to unsecured creditors, cannot be modified under § 1329 when a joint debtor passes away resulting in a substantial increase in non-exempt equity in the surviving debtor spouse.

Members

Complete Termination of The Automatic Stay Under §362(c)(3)(A) According to the First Circuit

March 3, 2019

By Carri Hayden Johnson, Staff Attorney to O. Byron Meredith, Chapter 13 Trustee (Savannah, GA) The filing of a bankruptcy petition acts as a stay of certain actions against the debtor or the debtor’s property. The automatic stay is essentially the fundamental reason that a debtor seeks relief in the form of bankruptcy, as it allows the debtor a brief...

Members

Negotiating Plan Confirmation with Secured Creditors – Issues Involving Balloon Payments and Other Mortgage Loans Subject to Modification Under § 1322(c) – Part 3

November 22, 2020

By David Cox,1 Cox Law Group, PLLC (Lynchburg, VA) III. Providing for the Secured Mortgage Claim, as Modified. A. Does the requirement of § 1325(a)(5)(B)(iii) for equal monthly payments permit the Debtor to propose a balloon payment in the payment of the creditor’s claim? Equal Monthly Payments Required By § 1325(a)(5)(B)(iii) Does NOT Permit Debtor To Propose A Balloon Payment....

Members

Musings from a Hapless Former BAP Law Clerk: Part 3 – the Standards of Review

M. Jonathan Hayes

February 15, 2026

My goal with this series of short articles is to convince you that the fear of appeals is misplaced.

Members

Parker, HOA, and Sanctions – Multiple Thrills to a Bankruptcy Lawyer’s Heart

May 2, 2021

By Cathy Moran, Esq., (Redwood City, CA) I don't know just what makes Parker such a treat for me, but it delivers multiple thrills to my bankruptcy lawyer heart. It's a stay violation case with a BIG sanctions award. It's a clearly, simply written opinion that lays out the circuit law on multiple issues. It hits hard at HOA hubris....

Members

Put Me In Coach, I’m Ready To Play

Merideth Akers

August 14, 2022

You may recognize the title of this article as being the chorus line from the John Fogerty song entitled, “Centerfield.” The song is about a baseball player ready to enter the game. We are at the mid-point of the Major League Baseball season. Coaches will be instructing and motivating their teams in hopes of winning games and eventually winning the...

Members

Word to the Wise: Failure to Properly Notice a Creditor Is Bad!

M. Jonathan Hayes

April 7, 2024

When the debtor fails to properly schedule a creditor in an asset case, is the now non-dischargeable debt under § 523(a)(3) limited to the amount the creditor would have received had it filed a proof of claim?

Members

Seventh Circuit Agrees with Ninth and Tenth

The Academy

May 19, 2024

In Marshall v Johnson, 2004 WL 1953490 (7th Cir. May 3, 2024), the Seventh Circuit agreed with the holdings from the Ninth and Tenth Circuits, In re Doll, 57 F.4th 1129 (10th Cir. 2023), and In re Evans, 69 F.4th 1101 (9th Cir. 2023). Under these decisions, Chapter 13 trustees may not retain fees when the case is dismissed prior to confirmation.

Critical Case Comment – Nothing Requires a Plan to Provide for All Secured Claims

Henry E. Hildebrand, III

December 12, 2021

If a Chapter 13 plan makes no provision for a mortgage obligation, omits any treatment of the mortgage claims, and prohibits the Trustee from making disbursements toward the claims, the claims are not provided for by the plan and the plan can be confirmed over the objection of the creditor and the trustee; nothing requires a plan to provide for...

Members

Bankruptcy Court Broadly Interprets “Engaged in Business” Requirement for Subchapter V Eligibility

Link to Post:

It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.

Or sign in below:

Related Articles

In the Trenches: Secrets to Settlement – Competency in the Courtroom Part 3 of 3

Boundaries of Modification Include Death

Complete Termination of The Automatic Stay Under §362(c)(3)(A) According to the First Circuit

Negotiating Plan Confirmation with Secured Creditors – Issues Involving Balloon Payments and Other Mortgage Loans Subject to Modification Under § 1322(c) – Part 3

Musings from a Hapless Former BAP Law Clerk: Part 3 – the Standards of Review

Parker, HOA, and Sanctions – Multiple Thrills to a Bankruptcy Lawyer’s Heart

Put Me In Coach, I’m Ready To Play

Word to the Wise: Failure to Properly Notice a Creditor Is Bad!

Seventh Circuit Agrees with Ninth and Tenth

Critical Case Comment – Nothing Requires a Plan to Provide for All Secured Claims

Academy

Members

Website

Legal

Looking to Become a Member?

Webinars

Member Articles

Industry News

To get started, please let us know which of these best fits your current position: