The NACTT Academy offers a comprehensive community for bankruptcy professionals seeking to advance their education in consumer bankruptcy.
ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
Espinosa: Through an Ethics Prism
Print This Article
Link to Post:
Tom Waldron, a former bankruptcy judge and current Advisor to the NACTT Academy, lives in Tucson, AZ.[email protected].
On March 23, 2010, the United States Supreme Court issued the decision in United Student Aid Funds Inc. v. Espinosa, 559 U.S.___, 2010 WL 1027825. There will be a number of articles exploring the many concerns addressed in the Court’s decision. This article takes a limited look at the decision through the prism of ethics.
In brief terms, the Court determined that the . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
Creditors’ Rights and Debtors’ Protections at the Intersection of Consumer Bankruptcy and UCC Article 9 – Part IV
Of Tax Refunds, Exemptions, Setoffs, and Roman Gods
Happy Thanksgiving
The Extent of 362(c)(3)’s Stay Termination: Bankruptcy Court Adds an Argument to the Debate
Tenancy by the Entireties and the § 522(f) Calculation
Never Let a Good Crisis Go to Waste: The Bankruptcy Amendments in the Consolidated Appropriations Acts of 2021
2022 Bankruptcy Procedure Year in Review: Revised Statute and Rules and Selected Cases Part 5 – Supreme Court Activity
The Change to Chapter 13 Law I’d Most Like to See?
How to Manage Incompetent, Unprepared, and Unreasonable Creditor Bankruptcy Counsel
Progeny of Law v. Siegel: Sixth and Ninth Circuits Say Right to Dismiss Chapter 13 Case is Absolute, Not Qualified by Section 105