The NACTT Academy offers a comprehensive community for bankruptcy professionals seeking to advance their education in consumer bankruptcy.
ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
Critical Case Comment: In re Reed
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Chapter 13 Trustee, Middle District of Tennessee
In re Reed, 2011 WL 3801859 (Bank. D.Or., Aug. 9, 2011) (Perris)
In the Ninth Circuit, when an above-median income Chapter 13 debtor has no (or negative) projected disposable income as calculated using the mechanical approach, there is no applicable commitment period for a debtor’s Chapter 13 plan, so the plan need not last five years.
Case Summary
The Reeds’ income exceeded Oregon’s median income for a family of their size, and their Chapter 13 plan . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
How My Law Firm Learned to Stop Leaving Money on the Table Part 3 – Valuable Lessons Learned in Automatic Stay Litigation
Student Loans in Existing Chapter 13’s
Diane Cipollone
The Cloud Cometh
Critical Case Comment – No Such Thing as “Technical” Violation of the Stay
Critical Case Comment – Pre-Confirmation Payments
Appointment of Deb Miller
Laudable, Shortsighted, and Vague: The CDC’s Eviction Moratorium
Remembrances of a Retired Trustee
Passing of the Honorable Randall L. Dunn