Bankruptcy & Lending To Friends: Watch the Paperwork

by Wendell Sherk, Missouri Bankruptcy Attorney

It’s not unusual for folks to get loans from friends and family when they’re in financial trouble or facing bankruptcy.  But it’s good to do the paperwork right sometimes.

If mom is going to lend you money to buy a car, she should act like the Bank of Mother and take the time to do the paperwork to make it a proper car loan, for example.  Depending on your state laws, this will often mean that you have a real promissory note that includes a security agreement — a pledge — of the car as collateral for the loan.  And mom’s lien should be recorded on the car’s certificate of title, just like a bank would.  At the same time the loan is made.

These sorts of details can protect mom’s right to collect the debt — and potentially make it easier for you to keep the car if you have to file bankruptcy some day.

What happens when you don’t jump through the paperwork hoops?  Sometimes everyone loses.  (At least everyone you care about!)

Take for example the recent case where a friend had taken out a mortgage on property from a friend.  The paperwork had been done correctly originally.  But later on, the friend lent more money.  Initially to help out with the borrower’s payroll but then the borrower used the money to pay the real estate taxes on the property.

When the borrower filed bankruptcy, the trustee believed there was enough equity in the property to sell it to make money for the other creditors.  The lender-friend claimed there was no equity — and therefore the trustee shouldn’t sell — because he had paid the real estate taxes (with the new loan) and added that to the balance of the mortgage was eating up the equity.

The 8th Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel allowed the trustee to sell.  It pointed out that the lender-friend had not complied with the actual loan contract — he had not paid the taxes himself and added it to the loan — but rather had made a new loan to his friend, who could have used it for other things including the original purpose (helping meet his payroll).

So the friendly lender would not have his new loan secured by the property, would not get that money back and the debtor lost the property.  All because two friends acted like friends do, helping one another out in a tight spot.

The moral to the story is that friendship is friendship.  And lending is… business — treat it like a business.  That way, no one else can step in and ruin your friendship later.

The case mentioned here is VanCura v. Hanrahan (In re Meill), #10-6019 (8th Cir. BAP 12/30/10) (slip opinion).


Wendell J. Sherk is an attorney in St. Louis, practicing primarily in consumer bankruptcy and debtor representation.  He graduated from Washington University in 1986 and Washington University School of Law in 1989.  He is a principal of the firm Sherk & Swope, LLC as well as a member of the National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys, American Bankruptcy Institute, and The Missouri Bar.  He contributes to the bankruptcylawnetwork.com blog and his e-mail is: [email protected].


No Author Biography has been linked to this Article.

Related Articles

QueneshiaFleming
October 29, 2023
I am delighted to be in the inaugural class of the Tom Vaughn Memorial Internship Program for Sylvia Ford Brown, Chapter 13 Standing Trustee for the Western District of Tennessee in Memphis. I truly feel that this internship has been invaluable to the furtherance of my career and the expansion of my knowledge of bankruptcy.  I. A Little About Me...
Copy of Hildebrand-2016
February 12, 2023
Section 1329(c), as it currently exists, forecloses the ability of Chapter 13 debtor to modify a confirmed plan to alter the plan payment amount while maintaining an extended plan, previously approved under the CARES Act. (Hanan) In re Nelson, 2022 WL 6795096 (Bankr. E.D. Wis. October 11, 2022) Case Summary Immediately after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, Congress sought...
Members
ahern_larry_regular
October 2, 2022
Introduction In In re Village Apothecary, Inc.,1 the Sixth Circuit recently cut an attorney's fee by half, where the services were not successful. The panel held that the results obtained (or, actually, the lack of results) justified the dramatic reduction of the fees of attorneys for a Chapter 7 trustee. In Part 1, we looked at . . . It...
Members
leforceheadshotcropped (2)
January 16, 2022
When do the facts justify a long bar to refiling over the 180-day period in § 109(g)? Sometimes it is Justice Stewart’s infamous words from Jacobellis v. Ohio, 378 U.S. 187 (1964)–“I know it when I see it.” Even so, a Trustee must provide evidence and authority to the Court for a long prejudice period. In In re Parson 2021...
Members
ahern_larry_regular
February 5, 2023
Introduction This series reviews developments in bankruptcy procedure during 2022. Amendments to 16 rules and one new rule took effect December 1, 2022. Many reflected changes necessitated by the Small Business Reorganization Act of 2019 (SBRA),1 and have been in place in the same or similar form on an interim basis since that legislation took effect.
Members
March 7, 2021
By Chris Hawkins, Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP (Birmingham, AL) The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) published its debt collection final rule in the Federal Register on November 30, 2020, revamping the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) for the first time since its enactment in 1977. Despite written comments submitted by several industry groups requesting clarity in areas where...
Members
Copy of Hildebrand-2016
February 27, 2022
Chapter 13 debtor is not obligated to pay both the disposable income pool and the best interest of creditors test pool to achieve confirmation, only the larger of the two; it is not a manifestation of bad faith that the debtor does not pay both the disposable income pool and the best interest of creditors test amounts. (Altenberger) In re...
Members
June 28, 2020
By Anthony J. Gomez, CPA, former extern to the Honorable John P. Gustafson, Northern District of Ohio at Toledo Click here for Part 1 Click here for Part 2 IV. The Hanging Paragraph’s effect on Interest Rates When the hanging paragraph is applicable, creditors are entitled to the full value of their secured claims as . . . It looks...
Members
October 20, 2019
By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired) Claimant in proof of claim lacking prima facie validity was sanctioned. The proof of claim secured by the debtor’s residence failed to satisfy Rule 3001(c)(2)(C) requirements, including incomplete Form B 410A with no payment history. The claimant’s attempt to amend the claim on the eve of the contested objection to claim would defeat...
Members
Copy of Hildebrand-2016
July 17, 2022
A referral fee by retained special counsel paid to debtor’s attorney violates the prohibition in § 504 in that the referral fee constitutes an unauthorized splitting of attorney’s fees. (Williamson) In re Davis, 638 B.R. 198 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. March 31, 2022) Case Summary Four years after Lisa Davis filed her Chapter 13 petition, she was involved in an auto...
Members

Looking to Become a Member?

ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.

Webinars

These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.

Member Articles

Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.

Industry News

The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.

To get started, please let us know which of these best fits your current position: