When is Enough, Enough? Pro Se Dismissed with Extended Prejudice (and Violates Bar)

When do the facts justify a long bar to refiling over the 180-day period in § 109(g)? Sometimes it is Justice Stewart’s infamous words from Jacobellis v. Ohio, 378 U.S. 187 (1964)–“I know it when I see it.” Even so, a Trustee must provide evidence and authority to the Court for a long prejudice period.

In In re Parson 2021 WL 4483124 (September 20, 2021), Chapter 13 Standing Trustee Thomas D. Powers, Northern District of Texas (Dallas Division) did just that. Judge Michelle V. Larson’s opinion provides a . . .

It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.

Or sign in below:

Jeff LeForce

Staff Attorney to Carey D. Ebert, Standing Chapter 13 Trustee for the Eastern District of Texas (Sherman and Texarkana Divisions)

Jeff LeForce is the Staff Attorney to Carey D. Ebert, Standing Chapter 13 Trustee, Eastern District of Texas in Plano. Before becoming a Staff Attorney, Jeff was a solo practitioner and a partner in an AmLaw 100 law firm with a practice focused on commercial bankruptcy, corporate workouts and restructuring, and complex business transactions. He also clerked for the Hon. Massie Tillman, United States Bankruptcy Court, Northern District of Texas (Fort Worth Division).Jeff received a B.B.A. in Finance and Economics from Baylor University in 1991 and a J.D. from Georgetown University Law Center in 1994. He is admitted to the State Bar of Texas, all Federal District Courts in Texas, and the Fourth and Fifth Circuits of the U.S. Courts of Appeal.

Forced Vesting by Any Other Name – Just Might Work

August 4, 2019

By Academy Staff Those who have been around consumer bankruptcy for a while remember the halcyon days when a Debtor surrendered property in the Plan; Plan was confirmed; lender would foreclosure and file its deficiency claim; Debtor would complete the Plan; and obtain a discharge of all unsecured debts including the deficiency balance. Lenders were able to realize on the...

Members

SSI, SSA and Violation of the Stay

Henry E. Hildebrand, III

August 3, 2025

It is a violation of the stay for the Social Security Administration to retain a debtor’s retirement social security benefits and apply them to an obligation for fraudulent receipt of SSI benefits.

Members

Critical Case Comment

February 3, 2019

By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Chapter 13 Trustee for the Middle District of TN (Nashville) Where a Chapter 13 plan provides that a mortgage payment will be paid “outside the plan,” the plan does not “provide for” the mortgage payment and, accordingly, the discharge under § 1328 is not applicable to the mortgage obligation. Dukes v. Suncoast Credit Union, 909...

Members

In Remembrance of Judge Theodor C. Albert

Scott C. Clarkson

August 10, 2025

“We remember and honor Theodor Albert not only for what he did, but for how he did it --with humor, humility, and heart.”

First Principles for First Meetings

October 11, 2020

By Cathy Moran, Esq. (Redwood City, CA) Once again, I sat in a 341 meeting where the trustee’s representative purported to deliver vital information to the assembled debtors. She had a captive audience of anxious listeners. She had ostensible power of life and death over their financial future. They needed to know what she had to say. But as communication,...

Members

Judicial Year in Review 2021: Part 3 – Selected Cases under Parts IV-VII of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure

Lawrence R. Ahern, III

December 5, 2021

Introduction Following Part 1's review of the December 1, 2021 changes in the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, and Part 2's digest of selected judicial decisions of interest for their procedural import . . . It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members. Join Now Or sign in below: Username or...

Members

Changes to Form 410A Effective December 1st

Debra L. Miller

November 12, 2023

Just a few more weeks ‘til principal and interest gotta be listed separately on a POC.

Members

Chapter 13 Trustee Duties, Powers, And Limitations – Part 4

October 25, 2020

By James J. Robinson, Chief United States Bankruptcy Judge, Northern District of Alabama Exactly whose interests does the trustee represent, and when should the trustee object or move to modify? Hope v. Acorn Financial, Inc., 731 F.3d 1189 (11th Cir. 2013). The Eleventh Circuit held that a chapter 13 trustee who was aware of defects with a secured claim before...

Members

Critical Case Comment

March 14, 2021

By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Chapter 13 Standing Trustee for the Middle District of Tennessee (Nashville) Despite a split in authority, funds held by a Chapter 13 Trustee at the time a case is dismissed prior to confirmation, are subject to the trustee’s commission before any balance is returned to the debtor. In re Doll, 17-20831-MER (Bankr. D.Colo. Feb. 19,...

Members

When is Enough, Enough? Pro Se Dismissed with Extended Prejudice (and Violates Bar)

Link to Post:

It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.

Or sign in below:

Jeff LeForce

Staff Attorney to Carey D. Ebert, Standing Chapter 13 Trustee for the Eastern District of Texas (Sherman and Texarkana Divisions)

Related Articles

Forced Vesting by Any Other Name – Just Might Work

SSI, SSA and Violation of the Stay

Critical Case Comment

In Remembrance of Judge Theodor C. Albert

First Principles for First Meetings

Judicial Year in Review 2021: Part 3 – Selected Cases under Parts IV-VII of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure

Changes to Form 410A Effective December 1st

Chapter 13 Trustee Duties, Powers, And Limitations – Part 4

More Questions (and Maybe Answers) from the Means Test Expenses Webinar

Critical Case Comment

Academy

Members

Website

Legal

Looking to Become a Member?

Webinars

Member Articles

Industry News

To get started, please let us know which of these best fits your current position: