The NACTT Academy offers a comprehensive community for bankruptcy professionals seeking to advance their education in consumer bankruptcy.
ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
Critical Case Comment
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By Henry E. Hildebrand, III
Executive Benefits Insurance Agency v. Arkison (In re Bellingham) 2014 WL 2560461 (S.Ct. June 9, 2014) (Thomas)
When a bankruptcy court is called upon to adjudicate a “core” matter, as defined by the statute, as to which the bankruptcy court is not given Constitutional authority to decide per Stern v. Marshall, 564 U.S. ______, 131 S.Ct. 2594 (2011), the statute will be construed to treat such matters as “non-core” subject to de novo review by an Article III court.
Case Summary
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
In the Trenches: Secrets to Settlement – Competency in the Courtroom Part 3 of 3
Is Nunc Pro Tunc Really Sunk?
Supreme Court Grants Certiorari in City of Chicago v. Fulton
Taking Care of Business: Recordkeeping for Small Businesses
How to Present an Effective Summary Judgment Motion
Of Grace Periods and Mortgage Payments
From the Editor – Lien Issues
Some Federal Protections are Stronger Than Others – Sovereign Immunity, Criminal Restitution, and the Automatic Stay
Critical Case Comment – Prime vs. Riskless Treasury Rate
Impact of COVID-19 and the CARES ACT on Mortgages