The NACTT Academy offers a comprehensive community for bankruptcy professionals seeking to advance their education in consumer bankruptcy.
ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
Critical Case Comment
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By Henry E. Hildebrand, III
Executive Benefits Insurance Agency v. Arkison (In re Bellingham) 2014 WL 2560461 (S.Ct. June 9, 2014) (Thomas)
When a bankruptcy court is called upon to adjudicate a “core” matter, as defined by the statute, as to which the bankruptcy court is not given Constitutional authority to decide per Stern v. Marshall, 564 U.S. ______, 131 S.Ct. 2594 (2011), the statute will be construed to treat such matters as “non-core” subject to de novo review by an Article III court.
Case Summary
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
Escrow 101 and 102
Passing of Memphis’ Beloved Judge Kennedy
What the FICO? Reaffirming Doesn’t Help My Credit Score?
Rules, Means-Test Amounts and Miscellaneous Fees: Changes Wrap Up 2020
Serendipity, a Tribute to Judge Jack B. Schmetterer
William E. Heitkamp (44)
A Lasting Impact: My Participation in the Tom Vaughn Memorial Internship Program
Critical Case Comment – Five Theories of Post-Confirmation Property Treatment
Post-Petition Causes of Action, Inheritances and Windfalls Are Property of the Estate and Must Be Reported to the Trustee – Part 5 of 5
Congress, It’s Time to Get Rid of That Stupid Means Test