In recent years, a handful of cases have discussed the issue of what happens to the trustee’s percentage fee, collected from debtor plan payments, upon the dismissal or conversion of a case prior to confirmation. This is an emerging area of law, with decisions on both sides. However, with this new issue, there appears to be at least some confusion...
Critical Case Comment
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By Henry E. Hildebrand, III
Executive Benefits Insurance Agency v. Arkison (In re Bellingham) 2014 WL 2560461 (S.Ct. June 9, 2014) (Thomas)
When a bankruptcy court is called upon to adjudicate a “core” matter, as defined by the statute, as to which the bankruptcy court is not given Constitutional authority to decide per Stern v. Marshall, 564 U.S. ______, 131 S.Ct. 2594 (2011), the statute will be construed to treat such matters as “non-core” subject to de novo review by an Article III court.
Case Summary
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
Critical Case Comment – Time is of the Essence
What, Exactly, Is the Trustee’s Percentage Fee
Notice of Error Regarding Misinformation Given During Phone Call to Mortgage Servicer
When the Duty to Provide Tax Returns Collides with Confidentiality
Safeguarding the Promise of a Fresh Start: Utilizing RESPA to Challenge Mortgage Servicing Errors Post-Discharge
From the Editor
What the FICO? Reaffirming Doesn’t Help My Credit Score?
Meet New Trustee Brian Tucci
From the Editor
Critical Case Comment