By Lawrence R. Ahern III, Brown & Ahern (Nashville, TN) PART II – BASICS OF PERFECTION OF SECURITY INTERESTS Introduction Current circumstances, with a pandemic and a recession, portend a wave of bankruptcy filings. In the consumer bankruptcy field, trustees and debtors' counsel often are uncomfortable with the rules in UCC Article 9. In this space, we have previously looked...
Critical Case Comment
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By Henry E. Hildebrand, III
Executive Benefits Insurance Agency v. Arkison (In re Bellingham) 2014 WL 2560461 (S.Ct. June 9, 2014) (Thomas)
When a bankruptcy court is called upon to adjudicate a “core” matter, as defined by the statute, as to which the bankruptcy court is not given Constitutional authority to decide per Stern v. Marshall, 564 U.S. ______, 131 S.Ct. 2594 (2011), the statute will be construed to treat such matters as “non-core” subject to de novo review by an Article III court.
Case Summary
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or sign in below:
Related Articles
A Day in the Life of a Chapter 13 Trustee
Beyond Professional Ethics
Negotiating Plan Confirmation with Secured Creditors – Issues Involving Balloon Payments and Other Mortgage Loans Subject to Modification Under § 1322(c) – Part 1 of 3
In re Crocker: New Approaches to Discharge Enforcement and Student Loan Dischargeability?
Critical Case Comment – Punitive Damages? Yep.
Creditors’ Rights and Debtors’ Protections at the Intersection of Consumer Bankruptcy and UCC Article 9
Critical Case Comment – A Mixed Bag of Inheritance
Thoughts on Zealous Advocacy – Addendum: “Zeal” Case Summaries – Behavior – Part 4
Thoughts on Zealous Advocacy Part 2
A Lasting Impact: My Participation in the Tom Vaughn Memorial Internship Program