Consumer Advocates Urge Senate to Extend Mortgage Forgiveness Tax Relief Act

nclc

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: December 19, 2013

Consumer Advocates Urge Senate to Extend Mortgage Forgiveness Tax Relief Act
Passage Would Ensure that Homeowner Mortgage Forgiveness Is Not Taxed As Income

(WASHINGTON, D.C.) Today, the U.S. Senate is expected to take up legislation that would protect distressed homeowners across the country from getting hit with a higher tax bill next year. An extension of the Mortgage Forgiveness Tax Relief Act will be introduced by Senator Debbie Stabenow. If passed, it would stop the IRS from taxing forgiven mortgage debt as income in the case of a short sale, refinancing, or foreclosure.

“We are pleased to see the Senate take this important step toward protecting homeowners from adverse, unfair, and counterintuitive tax consequences,” said National Consumer Law Center attorney Diane Thompson. “Homeowners facing financial difficulties so great that they are unable to pay their mortgages should not be taxed on a modification of that mortgage. All of us are better off when homeowners are able to keep their homes and continue paying on their mortgages. We appreciate greatly Speaker Reid and Senator Stabenow’s leadership in this area.”

If the current law is not extended, principal reduction modifications entered into after December 31, 2013, including those authorized by the recent settlement with JP Morgan Chase, will result in additional tax consequences for homeowners. Without an extension, far fewer modifications will be done and the modifications done will be less sustainable, with wide-reaching consequences for homeowners, the communities they live in, and the national economy. The settlements with some of the large financial institutions that are finally providing modifications with principal reductions for qualified homeowners should not end up penalizing the homeowners who have waited so long for assistance.

The tax relief law was first signed by President Bush in 2007 and was extended one year as part of the “fiscal cliff” legislation signed at the beginning of 2013. Before this provision was signed into law, if a family owed $150,000 on their home but could only sell it for $100,000, and the bank forgave the remaining $50,000 of the mortgage, the IRS would treat this $50,000 as taxable income. That would mean a typical middle-class family would have to pay an additional $12,500 in income taxes on top of their regular taxes.

###

Since 1969, the nonprofit National Consumer Law Center® (NCLC®) has worked for consumer justice and economic security for low-income and other disadvantaged people, including older adults, in the U.S. through its expertise in policy analysis and advocacy, publications, litigation, expert witness services, and training. www.nclc.org

Using e-mail is inherently insecure. Confidential information, including account numbers, credit card numbers, etc., should never be transmitted via e-mail or e-mail attachment. NCLC is not responsible for the loss or unauthorized disclosure of confidential information sent to NCLC via e-mail or attachment. This e-mail message is confidential and/or privileged and is for the use of the intended recipient only. All other use is prohibited.

Contacts: Diane Thompson, [email protected]
Jan Kruse, [email protected] or 617-542-8010
No Author Biography has been linked to this Article.

Related Articles

moran_cathy
February 13, 2022
When there’s a joint bank account and a bankruptcy filing, good intentions can quickly go sour. The bankruptcy trustee sees a pile of money in the bank to which the debtor has access, even though the account also bears the name of someone not in bankruptcy. If the debtor can get the money, the trustee contends, so can a bankruptcy...
Members
February 3, 2019
By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Chapter 13 Trustee for the Middle District of TN (Nashville) Where a Chapter 13 plan provides that a mortgage payment will be paid “outside the plan,” the plan does not “provide for” the mortgage payment and, accordingly, the discharge under § 1328 is not applicable to the mortgage obligation. Dukes v. Suncoast Credit Union, 909...
Members
January 24, 2021
By Cathy Moran, Esq. (Redwood City, CA) Bankruptcy debtors with delinquent utility bills got a measure of protection from interruption in their service under an amendment to the Bankruptcy Code in the omnibus spending bill enacted December 27,2020. Individual debtors cannot have their utilities disconnected as long as they make some payment for service provided promptly after the commencement of...
Members
August 11, 2019
By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Chapter 13 Standing Trustee (Nashville, TN) Exemptions in consumer cases have always presented difficult problems for practitioners and trustees. In a bow to states’ rights, the Bankruptcy Act of 1898 deferred to exemptions created by state law. When BAPCPA was enacted in 2005, Congress continued the practice of allowing each state to “opt out” of...
Members
NBR cropped 2
May 14, 2023
Dear Readers: Want to know why your 1L Civ Pro course is your best friend when it comes to “undue hardship” cases?  Because burdens of proof matter.  (They matter in other cases, too, but I’m in love with the case of Love v. U.S. Dept. of Education (In re Love), Case No. 19-20532-C-7, United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern...
Members
Cohen
October 1, 2023
In conjunction with The Academy’s recent webinar on Student Loans, Scott and Josh offer a follow-up check list – a MUST READ! “With all the new student loan servicing changes, what should debtor attorneys be doing as to pending chapter 13 cases where their clients owe federal student loans? Here’s the short list:”
Members
lutz
April 28, 2024
The Circuit Executive for the Sixth Circuit announces that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit has selected Douglas L. Lutz as Bankruptcy Judge for the Eastern District of Kentucky to fill the vacancy created by the retirement of Bankruptcy Judge Tracey N. Wise. He took the oath of office on April 19, 2024.
Mark
May 8, 2022
At my firm, we see a lot of consumers who have some combination of high debt and low income. Many of them arrive for their consultations after having been abused by debt collectors and predatory lenders, harmed by mortgage servicing errors, or subjected to inaccurate and derogatory credit reporting. Until fairly recently, after filing bankruptcies for these folks, we usually...
Members
August 30, 2020
By Wayne Silver, Wayne Silver Law (Redwood City, CA) The 120-day CARES Act eviction moratorium expired on Saturday, July 25. At the expiration of the moratorium, landlords covered by the federal moratorium could begin serving eviction notices, and begin filing eviction lawsuits 30 days thereafter. That means on Monday, August 24, 2020 the moratorium on evictions expired, while we face...
Members
January 17, 2021
By Lawrence R. Ahern III, Brown & Ahern (Nashville, TN) PART VII – CONSUMER CREDITORS' PENALTIES FOR VIOLATIONS OF FORECLOSURE AND OTHER ARTICLE 9 RULES Introduction In this space, we have looked at numerous topics involving the operation of Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) in bankruptcy; in the current series, we are reviewing Article 9's important rules...
Members

Looking to Become a Member?

ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.

Webinars

These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.

Member Articles

Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.

Industry News

The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.

To get started, please let us know which of these best fits your current position: