Consumer Advocates Urge Senate to Extend Mortgage Forgiveness Tax Relief Act


FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: December 19, 2013

Consumer Advocates Urge Senate to Extend Mortgage Forgiveness Tax Relief Act
Passage Would Ensure that Homeowner Mortgage Forgiveness Is Not Taxed As Income

(WASHINGTON, D.C.) Today, the U.S. Senate is expected to take up legislation that would protect distressed homeowners across the country from getting hit with a higher tax bill next year. An extension of the Mortgage Forgiveness Tax Relief Act will be introduced by Senator Debbie Stabenow. If passed, it would stop the IRS from taxing forgiven mortgage debt as income in the case of a short sale, refinancing, or foreclosure.

“We are pleased to see the Senate take this important step toward protecting homeowners from adverse, unfair, and counterintuitive tax consequences,” said National Consumer Law Center attorney Diane Thompson. “Homeowners facing financial difficulties so great that they are unable to pay their mortgages should not be taxed on a modification of that mortgage. All of us are better off when homeowners are able to keep their homes and continue paying on their mortgages. We appreciate greatly Speaker Reid and Senator Stabenow’s leadership in this area.”

If the current law is not extended, principal reduction modifications entered into after December 31, 2013, including those authorized by the recent settlement with JP Morgan Chase, will result in additional tax consequences for homeowners. Without an extension, far fewer modifications will be done and the modifications done will be less sustainable, with wide-reaching consequences for homeowners, the communities they live in, and the national economy. The settlements with some of the large financial institutions that are finally providing modifications with principal reductions for qualified homeowners should not end up penalizing the homeowners who have waited so long for assistance.

The tax relief law was first signed by President Bush in 2007 and was extended one year as part of the “fiscal cliff” legislation signed at the beginning of 2013. Before this provision was signed into law, if a family owed $150,000 on their home but could only sell it for $100,000, and the bank forgave the remaining $50,000 of the mortgage, the IRS would treat this $50,000 as taxable income. That would mean a typical middle-class family would have to pay an additional $12,500 in income taxes on top of their regular taxes.


Since 1969, the nonprofit National Consumer Law Center® (NCLC®) has worked for consumer justice and economic security for low-income and other disadvantaged people, including older adults, in the U.S. through its expertise in policy analysis and advocacy, publications, litigation, expert witness services, and training.

Using e-mail is inherently insecure. Confidential information, including account numbers, credit card numbers, etc., should never be transmitted via e-mail or e-mail attachment. NCLC is not responsible for the loss or unauthorized disclosure of confidential information sent to NCLC via e-mail or attachment. This e-mail message is confidential and/or privileged and is for the use of the intended recipient only. All other use is prohibited.

Contacts: Diane Thompson, [email protected]
Jan Kruse, [email protected] or 617-542-8010
No Author Biography has been linked to this Article.

Related Articles

October 6, 2019
By Jan Hamilton, Chapter 13 Standing Trustee (Topeka, KS) Click here for Part One Click here for Part Two What needs to be in a plan filed in a case under the SBRA? Start with the statute…1 A. Contents of Plan2 Comparison of “Contents . . . It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is...
Academy Circle Logo Final
January 16, 2022
NCLC seeking non-profit organizations to sign two letters (one to the CFPB and one to FHFA, FHA, VA, and USDA) urging the agencies to require servicers to pause foreclosure activity for at least 60 days after being notified that a borrower has applied for HAF assistance and meets conditional program eligibility. We ask organizations to sign both letters, and the...
February 28, 2021
By Joseph A. Bledsoe, III (“Jody”), Chapter 13 Standing Trustee for the Eastern District of North Carolina (New Bern) In the aftermath of City of Chicago v. Fulton, discussions abound as to whether it is sufficient for a chapter 13 debtor to seek return of his vehicle, repossessed prepetition, via a motion for turnover. Most seem to believe a motion...
May 8, 2022
At my firm, we see a lot of consumers who have some combination of high debt and low income. Many of them arrive for their consultations after having been abused by debt collectors and predatory lenders, harmed by mortgage servicing errors, or subjected to inaccurate and derogatory credit reporting. Until fairly recently, after filing bankruptcies for these folks, we usually...
August 4, 2019
By Jan Hamilton, Standing Chapter 13 Trustee (Topeka, KS) I just got back from RAGBRAI, which is a bicycle ride across Iowa. This year, it was 468 miles, with lots and lots of hills. (Biking Across Kansas was over 500 miles this year.) Such beautiful country. Estimates vary on actual number of riders, but anywhere from 16,000 to 20,000. Iowa...
September 11, 2022
Consumer bankruptcy attorneys in my experience tend to see appeals as a massively expensive undertaking fraught with unfamiliar rules and the threat of sanctions at every turn. That is not the reality. The purpose of this short article is to allay those fears. It’s a fun and satisfying process; dive in says I. Final order You can only appeal a...
February 2, 2020
By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired) Punitive damages reduced for FDCPA and RESPA violations. The mortgage servicer violated FDCPA, RESPA and the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act by treating account as delinquent after Chapter 13 debtor had cured arrears, brought account current and obtained discharge. The servicer mistakenly marked the Chapter 13 case as dismissed rather...
September 8, 2019
By Cathy Moran, Esq. (Redwood City, CA) The Federal Reserve reported that 40% of Americans couldn’t meet a $400 emergency without borrowing. A significant slice of them couldn’t pay it at all. So, a Bloomberg economist devoted his column to deconstructing how the press and political figures, in his opinion, misused that finding. OMGoodness. The guy was too caught up...
May 23, 2021
By The Honorable John P. Gustafson, United States Bankruptcy Judge, Northern District of Ohio (Toledo) Reaffirmation hearings during the pandemic have been difficult, at least for me. The economic risks for debtors are greater. There are uncertainties about the availability of credit, and the availability of suitable vehicles. Prices of used cars have gone up – with stimulus money pushing...
October 20, 2019
By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired) Claimant in proof of claim lacking prima facie validity was sanctioned. The proof of claim secured by the debtor’s residence failed to satisfy Rule 3001(c)(2)(C) requirements, including incomplete Form B 410A with no payment history. The claimant’s attempt to amend the claim on the eve of the contested objection to claim would defeat...