Consumer Advocates Urge Senate to Extend Mortgage Forgiveness Tax Relief Act

nclc

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: December 19, 2013

Consumer Advocates Urge Senate to Extend Mortgage Forgiveness Tax Relief Act
Passage Would Ensure that Homeowner Mortgage Forgiveness Is Not Taxed As Income

(WASHINGTON, D.C.) Today, the U.S. Senate is expected to take up legislation that would protect distressed homeowners across the country from getting hit with a higher tax bill next year. An extension of the Mortgage Forgiveness Tax Relief Act will be introduced by Senator Debbie Stabenow. If passed, it would stop the IRS from taxing forgiven mortgage debt as income in the case of a short sale, refinancing, or foreclosure.

“We are pleased to see the Senate take this important step toward protecting homeowners from adverse, unfair, and counterintuitive tax consequences,” said National Consumer Law Center attorney Diane Thompson. “Homeowners facing financial difficulties so great that they are unable to pay their mortgages should not be taxed on a modification of that mortgage. All of us are better off when homeowners are able to keep their homes and continue paying on their mortgages. We appreciate greatly Speaker Reid and Senator Stabenow’s leadership in this area.”

If the current law is not extended, principal reduction modifications entered into after December 31, 2013, including those authorized by the recent settlement with JP Morgan Chase, will result in additional tax consequences for homeowners. Without an extension, far fewer modifications will be done and the modifications done will be less sustainable, with wide-reaching consequences for homeowners, the communities they live in, and the national economy. The settlements with some of the large financial institutions that are finally providing modifications with principal reductions for qualified homeowners should not end up penalizing the homeowners who have waited so long for assistance.

The tax relief law was first signed by President Bush in 2007 and was extended one year as part of the “fiscal cliff” legislation signed at the beginning of 2013. Before this provision was signed into law, if a family owed $150,000 on their home but could only sell it for $100,000, and the bank forgave the remaining $50,000 of the mortgage, the IRS would treat this $50,000 as taxable income. That would mean a typical middle-class family would have to pay an additional $12,500 in income taxes on top of their regular taxes.

###

Since 1969, the nonprofit National Consumer Law Center® (NCLC®) has worked for consumer justice and economic security for low-income and other disadvantaged people, including older adults, in the U.S. through its expertise in policy analysis and advocacy, publications, litigation, expert witness services, and training. www.nclc.org

Using e-mail is inherently insecure. Confidential information, including account numbers, credit card numbers, etc., should never be transmitted via e-mail or e-mail attachment. NCLC is not responsible for the loss or unauthorized disclosure of confidential information sent to NCLC via e-mail or attachment. This e-mail message is confidential and/or privileged and is for the use of the intended recipient only. All other use is prohibited.

Contacts: Diane Thompson, [email protected]
Jan Kruse, [email protected] or 617-542-8010
No Author Biography has been linked to this Article.

Related Articles

Copy of Hildebrand-2016
It is incumbent upon nonbankruptcy attorneys, including personal injury attorneys, to verify on PACER that their client is not a debtor and that the cause of action as to which they represent their client is not property of the estate; failure to obtain approval of the bankruptcy court for representing a debtor or settlement of a personal injury action is...
August 9, 2020
By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired) Disputed claim included in calculation of eligibility. The debtor’s case was dismissed for exceeding § 109(e)’s unsecured debt limit, when the debtor had signed $1,092,000 mortgage note but the mortgage was never recorded. The lender filed an unsecured claim for $1.7 million, and the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel agreed with the bankruptcy court that...
Members
November 3, 2019
By Cathy Moran, Esq. (Redwood City, CA) After bankruptcy, credit scores go steadily up, says a 17 year study released by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Got that? Go UP. Every year. Importantly, credit scores start improving the same year that the bankruptcy is filed. Think on that for a moment. How collectors stoke fears about bankruptcy Creditors and their...
January 27, 2019
By Kathryne M. Shaw1 Boleman Law Firm, P.C. (Virginia Beach, VA) Click here for Part 1 In Part I of this article, we reviewed In re Holman, in which the debtors violated their confirmation order and exhibited bad faith . . . It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members. Join...
Members
beskin
October 22, 2023
Upon this auspicious occasion, seeing before us this eloquence of attorneys, let us recount the mighty deeds of one Herbert Lee Beskin. WHEREAS, Herbert was born and began his legal career in the last century (or we presume); and WHEREAS, a double Hoo, Herbert graduated from the University of Virginia with a B.A. in 1972, and stayed in Charlottesville to...
moran_cathy
June 30, 2024
“The client now claims that my words were a license to fail to disclose the gifts. Huh?”
Members
Copy of Hildebrand-2016
March 13, 2022
In order to invoke remedies granted under the CARES Act, Chapter 13 debtor need not have been current on the date of enactment as long as the debtor satisfies the conditions in the CARES Act. (Grabill) In re Gilbert, 622 BR 859 (Bankr. E.D. La. Oct. 6, 2020) Case Summary Chapter 13 Trustee sought dismissal of a number of cases...
Members
Copy of Hildebrand-2016
September 3, 2023
To pay present value to a secured creditor, a reorganization plan may start with a treasury rate and add a risk factor and need not start with a prime rate plus a risk factor.
Members
January 20, 2019
On October 1, 2018, Dynele L. Schinker-Kuharich was appointed as a Chapter 13 Standing Trustee for the Northern District of Ohio. She maintains her offices in Canton. Ms. Schinker-Kuharich replaces retiring Toby Rosen who served in this position for 30 years. Prior to her appointment as a Standing Chapter 13, Schinker-Kuharich was on the panel of Chapter 7 Trustees for...
Members
November 22, 2020
By Phil Lamos, Chief Legal Counsel, Office of the Chapter 13 Trustee Lauren A. Helbling (Cleveland, OH) Bankruptcy Rule 2002(a)(5) directs that 21 days’ notice must be given of the “time fixed to accept or reject a proposed modification of a [Chapter 13] plan.” But to whom must notice be given? Specifically, which creditors need to be given notice? This...
Members

Looking to Become a Member?

ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.

Webinars

These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.

Member Articles

Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.

Industry News

The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.

To get started, please let us know which of these best fits your current position: