(Used with permission. First published in the Southern District of Florida Courthouse Beacon, December 2021) Imagine this is an article entitled Wiley Champion, Esq. Instructs How To Win Your Case Every Time. Enticing for sure. You start reading. The opening paragraph needlessly re-states the title, needlessly names the author, who is already mentioned in the title, and then defines the...
Critical Case Comment
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Chapter 13 Trustee (Nashville, TN)
There is no requirement to show a change in circumstance in order to modify a Chapter 13 plan pursuant to § 1329. Whaley v. Guillen (In re Guillen), 2020 WL 5015287 (11th Cir. Aug. 25, 2020) (Marcus)
Case Summary
Rachel Guillen filed a Chapter 13 petition in August of 2015. She disclosed two secured creditors: Central Mortgage Company holding a first mortgage and Wells Fargo, allegedly, holding a secured priority mortgage on the debtor’s home. Guillen, however, disputed the validity of the lien that Wells Fargo . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or sign in below:
Related Articles
Retirement Accounts and the Projected Disposable Income Calculation
What Are You Waiting For? The Bankruptcy Filing Timeline
First Principles for First Meetings
Undervalued and Overworked? It’s Time to Fix Your Bankruptcy Firm’s Finances
Win Now, Wreck Later: A Tale of Bankruptcy and Mortgage Servicing
Bartenwerfer: Willful and Malicious Injuries?
On More Effective Writing
Forced Vesting by Any Other Name – Just Might Work
Conflicting Interpretations: A Chapter 13 Trustee’s Compensation After Pre-Confirmation Dismissal or Conversion – Part 2 of 3
Minding the Post-Confirmation Gate: Creditors Gotta’ Get It Right the First Time