The NACTT Academy offers a comprehensive community for bankruptcy professionals seeking to advance their education in consumer bankruptcy.
ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
From the Editor – Fair Debt Collection Practices Act
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired)
Punitive damages reduced for FDCPA and RESPA violations. The mortgage servicer violated FDCPA, RESPA and the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act by treating account as delinquent after Chapter 13 debtor had cured arrears, brought account current and obtained discharge. The servicer mistakenly marked the Chapter 13 case as dismissed rather than discharged and continued collection efforts. A jury awarded $582,000 compensatory damages and $3 million punitive, but the Seventh Circuit concluded that the ratio of punitive damages was excessive, finding that maximum punitive damages would . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
The Student Loan Debacle: Causes & Cures
CARES Act Financial Hardship ‘Laundry List’
What I Learned about Bankruptcy on Facebook
Money For Nothing
2024 Update: Federal Guidance on Discharging Student Loans in Bankruptcy IS a Game Changer
Debt Buyers Pay a Lot Post-Taggart
The PUMP Act
The Unintended Filing Bar – Don’t Ignore MFR on Surrendered Property
Critical Case Comment – Debtor Refuses to Give Location of Surrendered Mercedes; Pleads the Fifth
SCOTUS Rules Insurer Is Party in Interest, Reversing Fourth Circuit