From the Editor – Fair Debt Collection Practices Act

By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired)

Punitive damages reduced for FDCPA and RESPA violations. The mortgage servicer violated FDCPA, RESPA and the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act by treating account as delinquent after Chapter 13 debtor had cured arrears, brought account current and obtained discharge. The servicer mistakenly marked the Chapter 13 case as dismissed rather than discharged and continued collection efforts. A jury awarded $582,000 compensatory damages and $3 million punitive, but the Seventh Circuit concluded that the ratio of punitive damages was excessive, finding that maximum punitive damages would . . .

It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.

Or sign in below:

No Author Biography has been linked to this Article.

Critical Case Comment

February 24, 2019

By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Chapter 13 Standing Trustee for the Middle District of Tennessee (Nashville) It was impermissible and contrary to the provisions of the Bankruptcy Code for the bankruptcy clerk to enter an order which dismissed a Chapter 13 case based only upon the trustee’s certification that the debtor did not make a timely first payment. (Duncan). No...

Members

Critical Case Comment – The Plan Rules

Henry E. Hildebrand, III

December 4, 2022

Chapter 13 plan which provided a specific amount to be cured on a reverse mortgage under § 1322(b)(5) would be controlled by the specific term of the plan provision and not by the larger proof of claim filed by the creditor. (Baer) In re Edelstein, 2022 WL 16730027 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. November 7, 2022) Case Summary The Edelsteins filed Chapter...

Members

Don’t Be Dismissive – Rule 41

Cathy Moran

August 6, 2023

I was the third attorney on this lien avoidance matter. Instead of it being “third time’s the charm”, it came close to being “three strikes and you’re out.” All because of FRBP 7041. This was the set up: debtor’s original counsel filed a number of lien avoidance actions, including the one against a landlord with a large default judgment. The...

Members

Bankruptcy Court Finds Jurisdiction to Hear Discharge-Injunction Violation Class Action

May 9, 2021

By Lawrence R. Ahern, III, Brown & Ahern (Nashville, TN) Introduction The Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of New York ruled last month, in a case styled In re Ajasa,1 that bankruptcy courts have subject matter jurisdiction to consider nationwide class actions that allege contempt of discharge injunctions. The broader effect of the opinion is that a discharge injunction...

Members

Critical Case Comment – Pre to Pre and Post to Post

Henry E. Hildebrand, III

March 5, 2023

Mortgage loan servicer violated mortgage agreement with debtor, the automatic stay, the confirmation order and Rule 3002.1 by applying debtor’s post-petition monthly mortgage payments pursuant to the contractual terms of the loan, thereby applying post-petition payments to the debtor’s pre-petition mortgage arrearage. (Cary) In re Pope, 647 B.R. 597 (Bankr. D. N.H. August 15, 2022) Case Summary In November of...

Members

A Practical Approach to Using Bankruptcy Rules Effectively – Part 3

Beverly M. Burden

February 16, 2025

This third article could be subtitled: “Uh-Oh! I Can’t Meet (or I Missed) a Deadline.” Setting deadlines is a critical component of any set of procedural rules. Practitioners must be aware of not only when and how a deadline can be extended, but WHETHER a deadline can be extended.

Members

The Hanging Paragraph – Hanging on Every Word Part 3 of 4

June 28, 2020

By Anthony J. Gomez, CPA, former extern to the Honorable John P. Gustafson, Northern District of Ohio at Toledo Click here for Part 1 Click here for Part 2 IV. The Hanging Paragraph’s effect on Interest Rates When the hanging paragraph is applicable, creditors are entitled to the full value of their secured claims as . . . It looks...

Members

Foreclosure Sales as Fraudulent Transfers: Study Summary

Edward C. Boltz

June 9, 2024

Attorney Boltz shares a summary of a new study which looks at the Supreme Court ruling that noncollusive, regular foreclosure sales aren't voidable by a bankruptcy trustee, but collusive or irregular sales can be challenged by unsecured creditors, who can cloud the title if fraud is involved. The study explores when these sales can be avoided.

Members

Rebecca Rogers Garcia

February 10, 2019

Rebecca Rogers Garcia was a staff attorney for Mary B. Grossman, the Chapter 13 Trustee in Milwaukee from 2002 until November 2014. Prior to her employment with the Chapter 13 Trustee; she represented debtors in consumer cases. Ms. Garcia is on the board of the Bankruptcy, Insolvency and Creditors Rights Section of the State Bar of Wisconsin and a member...

Passing of Judge – District of New Mexico

The Academy

May 11, 2025

We are sorry to report that Bankruptcy Judge David T. Thuma passed away on Thursday, May 8, after fighting a courageous battle with cancer.

From the Editor – Fair Debt Collection Practices Act

Link to Post:

It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.

Or sign in below:

Related Articles

Critical Case Comment

Critical Case Comment – The Plan Rules

Don’t Be Dismissive – Rule 41

Bankruptcy Court Finds Jurisdiction to Hear Discharge-Injunction Violation Class Action

Critical Case Comment – Pre to Pre and Post to Post

A Practical Approach to Using Bankruptcy Rules Effectively – Part 3

The Hanging Paragraph – Hanging on Every Word Part 3 of 4

Foreclosure Sales as Fraudulent Transfers: Study Summary

Rebecca Rogers Garcia

Passing of Judge – District of New Mexico

Academy

Members

Website

Legal

Looking to Become a Member?

Webinars

Member Articles

Industry News

To get started, please let us know which of these best fits your current position: