The NACTT Academy offers a comprehensive community for bankruptcy professionals seeking to advance their education in consumer bankruptcy.
ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
From the Editor
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By Wm. Houston Brown, United States Bankruptcy Judge (Retired)
Debtor’s Attorney - Suspension of firm upheld. The District court affirmed the 90-day suspension of Law Solutions Chicago, LLC (d/b/a UpRight Law, LLC), with the record supporting the bankruptcy court’s findings that the firm failed to adequately represent the debtor in a “simple” consumer case. Disgorgement of fees was appropriate under § 526(c)(1) when the firm failed to provide the debtor with a properly executed written contract. The suspension and sanctions were narrowly tailored as required by In re First City . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
From the Editor
2022 Bankruptcy Procedure Year in Review: Revised Statute and Rules and Selected Cases Part 8 Selected Decisions Under Part III of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure
The Effect of “Success” (Or the Lack of It) on Attorneys’ Fees
Evidentiary Issues Arising from Attempts to Prove Alleged “Facts” Stated in The Monster Mash
Passing of Wichita Attorney
New Fellows of American College of Bankruptcy
From the Editor
List It or Lose It: When Actual Knowledge Isn’t Enough
Why Chapter 13 Is a Good Idea: Outcomes and Measures of Success
Automatic Stay Denial of Stay Relief was Final and Appealable, Although It Was “Without Prejudice.”