By Mark C. Leffler, Boleman Law Firm, PC (Richmond, Hampton, and Va. Beach, VA) Part I: Derby v. Portfolio Recovery Associates Recently, Hon. Keith L. Phillips of the Eastern District of Virginia Bankruptcy Court issued his fourth and final written opinion in the Derby v. Portfolio Recovery Associates adversary proceeding, Adv. Pro. No. 18-03097-KLP, 2020 Bankr. LEXIS 2589 (Bankr. E.D.Va....
From the Editor
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By Wm. Houston Brown, United States Bankruptcy Judge (Retired)
Debtor’s Attorney - Chapter 13 no-look fee subject to Hawai’i’s general excise tax. Construing the State’s excise tax, the Chapter 13 debtor’s attorney could not collect the required excise tax in addition to the agreed upon no-look fee. The district’s Rights and Responsibilities Agreement between debtor and attorney did not contain provision for the excise tax to be passed on the client or the bankruptcy estate. In re Anderson, _________B.R._________, 2018 WL 6445718 (Bankr. D. Hawai . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or sign in below:
Related Articles
In Remembrance of Judge Theodor C. Albert
Leadership, Office Culture, & Policy
Wholly Unsecured Junior Liens in Chapter 13: The Lien Strip Dance
Creditors’ Rights and Debtors’ Protections at the Intersection of Consumer Bankruptcy and UCC Article 9
ABI Commission on Consumer Bankruptcy – A Chapter 7 Trustee’s Sale of Encumbered Property
From the Editor – Claims
Recent Trends in the Interpretation of Midland v. Johnson and the Applicability of the FDCPA to Bankruptcy Cases
Ask Ms. Ps and Qs
Reconversion to Chapter 13 – Betwixt and Between?
Supreme Court Agrees to Revisit Finality of Orders in Bankruptcy