ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
From the Editor
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By Wm. Houston Brown, United States Bankruptcy Judge (Retired)
Confirmation - Bankruptcy court could not sua sponte object to confirmation. Distinguishing between “self-executing” provisions of the Code and those sections that were not “self-executing,” and discussing Espinosa’s impact on that distinction, District Court held that the bankruptcy court could not sua sponte object to confirmation based on the above- median debtor’s calculation of disposable income. Section 1325(b)(1) gives only the trustee and unsecured creditors authority to object to confirmation based on failure to commit projected disposable income to plan . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
Is That AI in Your Inbox or Are You Just Happy to Paste Me?
Win Now, Wreck Later: A Tale of Bankruptcy and Mortgage Servicing
Mortgage Matters in Times of COVID-19
Chapter 13 NoLook Fees: The Horns of a Dilemma
Judge Carol A. Doyle: Pre-Retirement Interview
Property of the Estate or Appeal Rights for Sale?
Recent Trends in the Interpretation of Midland v. Johnson and the Applicability of the FDCPA to Bankruptcy Cases – Part II: Thomas v. Midland Funding, LLC
Critical Case Comment – Punitive Damages? Yep.
Don’t Bank on Withdrawal
From the Editor – Claims