By Mark C. Leffler, Boleman Law Firm, PC (Richmond, Hampton, and Va. Beach, VA) Part I: Derby v. Portfolio Recovery Associates Recently, Hon. Keith L. Phillips of the Eastern District of Virginia Bankruptcy Court issued his fourth and final written opinion in the Derby v. Portfolio Recovery Associates adversary proceeding, Adv. Pro. No. 18-03097-KLP, 2020 Bankr. LEXIS 2589 (Bankr. E.D.Va....
From the Editor
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By Wm. Houston Brown, United States Bankruptcy Judge (Retired)
Discharge in Chapter 13
Direct payments on mortgage were payments under the plan. The confirmed plan provided for payments to the trustee to cure arrearage, while the debtors were to make direct payment on the ongoing mortgage, but the debtors defaulted on those direct payments. Discharge had been entered after the trustee filed notice of cure of arrearage, but the trustee subsequently filed a complaint to revoke discharge. The court did not revoke the discharge, because the trustee had been advised . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
Recent Trends in the Interpretation of Midland v. Johnson and the Applicability of the FDCPA to Bankruptcy Cases
IRS Extends April 15, Other Upcoming Deadlines for Alabama Storm Victims, Provides Other Tax Relief
Can a Secured Claim Still “Ride-Through” Bankruptcy Despite BAPCPA? Part 2: Looking Beyond In re Rhodes
Tax Projections and the Means Test
2022 Bankruptcy Procedure Year in Review: Revised Statute and Rules and Selected Cases – Part 3 Rules Related to SBRA (Continued)
If You’re Gonna Bet the Farm, Maybe Play Against the House
A Salute to the Consumer Litigation Five Star General
Small Business Chapter 11 Update, Where Are We Eight Months In?
Critical Case Comment – 10th Circuit Says No Default Cures After Month 60
The Day the Music Died