Critical Case Comment

By Henry E. Hildebrand, III Chapter 13 Trustee (Nashville, TN)

Although a secured creditor with a purchase money security interest in personal property is entitled to adequate protection payments under § 1326(a)(1), the trustee is not obligated to make the payments without a motion, hearing, or court order. (Gorman) In re Housley, 2018 WL 1005285 (Bankr. C.D. Ill. February 21, 2018)

Case Summary

Jennifer Housley filed a Chapter 13 petition in December of 2017. Her plan proposed to pay Ideal Auto Sales, a secured creditor, $12,400 at 6.25% interest with estimated monthly . . .

It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.

Or sign in below:

No Author Biography has been linked to this Article.

When the Bankruptcy Attorney Resembles the Client

Jen Lee

August 10, 2025

We tell clients delay is costly—then ignore that advice ourselves.

Members

Critical Case Comment – Hell Hath No Fury, Until It Meets the S.D. of PA

Henry E. Hildebrand, III

July 31, 2022

Chapter 13 debtor’s profligate, pre-petition spending and post-petition lack of candor, demonstrated that the plan was not proposed in good faith and the petition was not filed in good faith. (Frank) In re Ames, 2022 WL 2195469 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. June 17, 2022) Case Summary In April of 2018, after 10 years of marriage, Guy Ames initiated a divorce complaint...

Members

Court Review of Fee Applications in Chapter 13: One Judge’s Perspective

August 16, 2020

By Hon. Brian Lynch, Bankruptcy Judge, WAWB “[T]he bankruptcy court has a duty to review fee applications, notwithstanding the absence of objections by the United States trustee (“UST”), creditors, or any other interested party….” In re Busy Beaver Bldg. Ctrs., Inc., 19 F.3d 833, 841 (3d Cir. 1994). In Chapter 13 cases this role is critical because in this judge’s...

Members

Admissions by a Party Opponent Usually Saves the Day but Not Always

Judge Corali Lopez-Castro

February 9, 2025

“. . . Rules of Evidence can be confusing . . . , particularly the rules about hearsay. Is a statement hearsay but admissible under an exception? Or, is the statement non-hearsay and, therefore, admissible under another rule?” Judge Lopez-Castro takes a look at admissions you will want to read!

Members

Getting Paid for All Your Work Even Post Discharge

Cathy Moran

April 13, 2025

Tired of eating fees at the end of a Chapter 13 when the debtor/client gets a discharge and you get to write off the time you spent in excess of the approved fee? Meet the Bingham Provision!

Members

Supreme Court to Consider Judicial Estoppel

M. Jonathan Hayes

November 9, 2025

Last month, the Supreme Court granted cert agreeing to consider the issue of judicial estoppel arising in a Chapter 13 case.

Members

Supreme Court Corner: Homestead vs. Lien

M. Jonathan Hayes

November 17, 2024

Issue: Does the bankruptcy discharge terminate the right of a secured creditor to foreclose its lien on the debtor’s exempt homestead?

Members

Finding Your Village: An Introductory Guide to Bringing Fair Credit Reporting Act Claims for Clients Post-Bankruptcy

Emily Connor Kennedy

July 24, 2022

I hope that you’ve enjoyed the articles from Mark Leffler and Steve Relyea discussing how our firm began litigating against creditors in bankruptcy court and mortgage servicers in federal district court. In this (final) installment, I will discuss our entry into Fair Credit Reporting Act litigation. Our firm’s history with Fair Credit Reporting Act litigation is intertwined with the relationships...

Members

The First Thing a Chapter 13 Debtor’s Attorney Should Know About the Small Business Reorganization Act of 2019

October 13, 2019

By Lawrence R. Ahern, III, Brown & Ahern (Nashville, TN) Click here for Part I, Introduction to the 2019 Legislation Click here for Part II, Five Things a Trustee Should Know About SBRA Part III The Small Business Reorganization Act of 2019 (SBRA)1 is of interest to attorneys whose clients in troubled . . . It looks like you are...

Members

SCOTUS Cases Every Bankruptcy Lawyer Should Know – Part 4 of 8

The Honorable John P. Gustafson

November 30, 2025

In the continually evolving field of consumer bankruptcy law, a series of Supreme Court decisions shape how cases are administered nationwide. Over the coming weeks, we will highlight key decisions that every bankruptcy practitioner should recognize—both by name and by the issues they resolve. This week’s ‘memory work’ is: Dewsnup v. Timm; Marrama; Rash; and Till

Members

Critical Case Comment

Link to Post:

It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.

Or sign in below:

Related Articles

When the Bankruptcy Attorney Resembles the Client

Critical Case Comment – Hell Hath No Fury, Until It Meets the S.D. of PA

Court Review of Fee Applications in Chapter 13: One Judge’s Perspective

Admissions by a Party Opponent Usually Saves the Day but Not Always

Getting Paid for All Your Work Even Post Discharge

Supreme Court to Consider Judicial Estoppel

Supreme Court Corner: Homestead vs. Lien

Finding Your Village: An Introductory Guide to Bringing Fair Credit Reporting Act Claims for Clients Post-Bankruptcy

The First Thing a Chapter 13 Debtor’s Attorney Should Know About the Small Business Reorganization Act of 2019

SCOTUS Cases Every Bankruptcy Lawyer Should Know – Part 4 of 8

Academy

Members

Website

Legal

Looking to Become a Member?

Webinars

Member Articles

Industry News

To get started, please let us know which of these best fits your current position: