The NACTT Academy offers a comprehensive community for bankruptcy professionals seeking to advance their education in consumer bankruptcy.
ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
Critical Case Comment
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By Henry E. Hildebrand, III
Bankruptcy courts have the discretion to permit debtors to cure deficiencies in their Chapter 13 plans even if in doing so, the Chapter 13 plan exceeds 60 months from the date of first payment. (Krause) In re Klaas, 858 F.3d 820 (3rd Cir. June 1, 2017)
Case Summary
Paul and Beth Ann Klaas filed their Chapter 13 petition in 2009, proposing to make payments over a 60-month period. During the pendency of the case, an adjustment was made to provide for a mortgage payment increase and the . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
TMI: Too Much Information
Creditors’ Rights and Debtors’ Protections at the Intersection of Consumer Bankruptcy and UCC Article 9 – Part IV
Bozeman Revisited: The Anti-Modification Clause Chisels Away at Espinosa
Arbitration in Bankruptcy: Reading Opinions & Tea Leaves in Recent Supreme Court & Lower Court Actions
How My Law Firm Learned to Stop Leaving Money on the Table Part 4 – Making Willful Stay Violations Pay Off
Two Supreme Court Decisions with Effects on Bankruptcy Practice
Chapter 13 Discharge Expanded by COVID Relief Legislation
The Effect of “Success” (or the Lack of It) on Attorneys’ Fees Part 2: In re Village Apothecary, Inc.
Critical Case Comment – Topping Off the Risk Factor
In re Kaiser Gypsum Co., Inc., 60 F.4th 73 (4th Cir. 2023), pet. for cert. granted, Truck Ins. Exchange v. Kaiser Gypsum Co., Inc., 2023 WL 6780372, (U.S., October 13, 2023).