By Lawrence R. Ahern, III, Brown & Ahern (Nashville, TN) Introduction This series has focused on the four bankruptcy-related bills that were enacted during the 116th Congress and signed into law on August 23, 2019. One bill, the Small Business Reorganization Act of 2019 (SBRA), became effective February 19, 2020. It appears in its entirety in Appendix B to this...
Critical Case Comment
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Chapter 13 Standing Trustee for the Middle District of Tennessee (Nashville)
A domestic support obligation claimholder is prohibited from intercepting a Chapter 13 debtor’s post-confirmation income if such is inconsistent with the debtor’s plan and confirmation order. State of Florida Department of Revenue v. Gonzalez (In re Gonzalez), 2016 WL 4245422 (11th Cir. August 11, 2016) (Siler)
Case Summary
In May of 2011, Gonzalez filed a Chapter 13 petition. He proposed in his plan that arrearages to a domestic support obligation claimholder would be paid in . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
While Chapter 7 Filings Continue to Decline, Chapter 13 Filings are Trending Slightly Upward
From the Editor – Dismissal
Two Final Observations about the SBRA – Part IX
Ask Ms. Ps & Qs
Complete Termination of The Automatic Stay Under §362(c)(3)(A) According to the First Circuit
Critical Case Comment – Debtor Refuses to Give Location of Surrendered Mercedes; Pleads the Fifth
2022 Bankruptcy Procedure Year in Review: Revised Statute and Rules and Selected Cases – Part 7 Selected Decisions Under Parts I and II of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure
Critical Case Comment– Absolute Right to Dismiss But Not the End of the Story
Court Supervised Student Loan Modification
Is Voluntary Dismissal of a Chapter 13 Case an Absolute Right?