Judge Carol A. Doyle: Pre-Retirement Interview

(Reprinted with permission.  Bankruptcy Court Liaison Committee Newsletter – Spring 2023 (Northern District of Illinois))

During her tenure as a bankruptcy judge for nearly 24 years, Judge Carol A. Doyle has presided over countless chapter 7, 11, and 13 cases, leaving a lasting impact on the Chicago bankruptcy landscape.  She has been a dedicated and respected member of the bankruptcy bench, and has served as a role model to new lawyers. Judge Doyle’s passion and commitment to justice, objectively resolving disputes, and mentorship, have influenced countless lives, and she will undoubtedly continue to serve as a powerful voice going forward in her retirement.

After graduating from University of Iowa, Judge Doyle attended Loyola University of Chicago School of Law, where she graduated with distinction.  Immediately after graduating, Judge Doyle clerked for Judge John A. Nordberg at the Northern District of Illinois District Court for three years.  Reflecting on her experience, Judge Doyle described clerking as an incredible and challenging job, humbly explaining that she was grateful and lucky to have worked for Judge Nordberg. 

After drafting opinions and being exposed to a litany of types of litigation as a clerk, Judge Doyle found herself most marketable as a litigator.  Post-clerkship, she worked at Sidley Austin in the business and environmental litigation group. 

So what led Judge Doyle to the bankruptcy bench?  To put it simply – a mix of hard work, an interest in serving the public, a curiosity about bankruptcy, and perhaps most importantly, an exceptional mentor who tapped her on the shoulder and said “you would be great at this!”  The application sought an attorney with experience in complex federal litigation, an area in which Judge Doyle was already well-versed. 

After her appointment in 1999, Judge Doyle allowed herself a one-year grace period to dedicate to gaining a deep understanding of bankruptcy law and procedure.  She quickly realized it would be a lifelong career of learning.  After two decades on the bench, Judge Doyle notes that while the area is everchanging and complex, that is what makes bankruptcy fun and challenging.  What is different about bankruptcy, compared to other areas of law, is that there are a litany of issues that arise throughout the case that usually quickly need rulings.  

Whether written or oral, Judge Doyle’s procedure for issuing an opinion is the same.  In a concise manor, with no legalese, the process involves: (1) teeing up the issue, (2) providing the relevant standard and only important facts, (3) deciding the outcome, and (4) explaining why the winner wins and the looser loses, paying careful attention to address each party’s arguments.  Explaining why the losing party is incorrect is vital to ensuring parties feel heard and like they had their day in court. 

Aside from drafting opinions, the collegiality of the bench is one of Judge Doyle’s favorite parts of being on the bench.  When she first started, she would often turn to her mentor-judge or walk down the hallway to chat with other judges about tougher issues.  As a bankruptcy judge – i.e. a neutral decision maker with access only to party filings and presentations in court – Judge Doyle understood that she only saw the tip of the iceberg.  She often needed to look deeper to understand why parties were making certain arguments, or who held the “power” in the case, to make a learned decision.

One of Judge Doyle’s fondest memories is being the unofficial “social committee chair” of the Bankruptcy Court.  She often organized social events and lunches that were well-attended.  As someone who was always close with her chambers, once COVID hit, Judge Doyle turned to Zoom to hold weekly meetings with her clerks and staff, where they would discuss work and non-work related topics. 

What will Judge Doyle miss most about the bench?  First is her colleagues, who have become lifelong friends.  She has enjoyed the camaraderie and the togetherness that comes with working with a big group and having to make important decisions for the bankruptcy community at large.  Judge Doyle will also miss the challenge and the sense of contributing to the bankruptcy system, humanity, and justice.  Judge Doyle, who has been working since she was fourteen years old, has always had a “to do list” and a planned, structured week.  After she retires this spring, Judge Doyle is looking forward to having additional free time to work on her gardening skills, spending time with family, and traveling. 

What is clear from my conversation from Judge Doyle is how impactful mentors were to her career, and on the other side of the coin, how devoted Judge Doyle is to mentoring young lawyers.  Judge Doyle explained that the most important inflection point in her professional career was her mentor at Sidley suggesting she apply to the judgeship.  In the same vein, Judge Doyle has made it a point give back by mentoring young lawyers in the community.  While the purpose of our meeting was to discuss Judge Doyle’s career and retirement plans, Judge Doyle went out of her way to offer this (among many other golden nuggets) impactful advice:  mentor and be mentored, and take the time to establish meaningful, human relationships with others in the community.  Judge Doyle would like to express her gratitude to the Chicago bankruptcy community, for their trust and support throughout her career.

samantharuben
Dentons’ Restructuring Insolvency and Bankruptcy Practice

Samantha Ruben is a member of Dentons’ Restructuring Insolvency and Bankruptcy practice in the Chicago office.  Samantha’s practice includes bankruptcy and commercial litigation matters and financial restructuring in- and out-of-court in all industries.  She has experience representing debtors, creditors, creditors’ committees, investors, distressed asset purchasers, professionals, and other parties-in-interest in chapter 11 reorganizations.  Prior to joining Dentons, Samantha served as a judicial law clerk for two years for Judge Benjamin Kahn in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, where she assisted on chapter 7, 11 (including subchapter V), 12, and 13 cases.

Related Articles

January 6, 2019
By Academy Staff In July of 2016 ConsiderChapter13.org posted an article, “Another Arrow in the Quiver of the ‘Less Than Honest Debtor’.” That article addressed a decision of the Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee in In re Hurt, 2015 WL 9592064 (Bankr. E.D. Tn. 2015), in which the Court overruled the Trustee’s objection to exemptions. In Hurt,...
Members
moran_cathy
October 30, 2022
Spending every dollar they make, and then some, is often how our Chapter 13 clients got into financial trouble. Yet Chapter 13, as practiced, validates the practice of continuing to spend 100% of each month’s income during the life of the plan. In doing so, we, as a society, squander the chance to use Chapter 13 to teach new budgeting...
Members
January 13, 2019
By Kathryne M. Shaw,1 Boleman Law Firm, P.C. (Virginia Beach, VA) Click here for Part 2 The bankruptcy system requires good faith on the part of a debtor in exchange for the promise of a fresh start, and responsible members of the bankruptcy bar constantly work to ensure that no one “games” this powerful system. So, how does a debtor...
Members
Academy-emeritus-Logo-gold3
October 15, 2023
A question recently presented to the NACTT Emeritus Trustees is “the change to chapter 13 law I’d most like to see?” Here is a summary of their responses. This question was presented by a ConsiderChapter13.org reader. If you have a question for the Emeritus Trustees or Ms. Ps & Qs (ethics), please submit them here.
Members
Copy of Hildebrand-2016
In determining the appropriate “present value” factor to be added to the payment of a secured claim in a Chapter 12, the Court should look at the “riskless” treasury rate rather than the “prime rate” before enhancing it with a risk factor.  (Ebinger) Farm Credit Services of America v. Topp, 2022 WL 2981590 (S.D. Iowa, July 19, 2022) Case Summary...
Members
March 14, 2021
By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired) Section 524(i) applies only to long-term debts not discharged through plan. Whether § 524(i) applied to short-term secured debts that are paid in full and discharged through a Chapter 13 plan was a matter of first impression, with the Court finding no other court had yet decided precise question. Factors used in Supreme...
Members
moran_cathy
December 3, 2023
“We’re confronted with a dilemma: if we pay practitioners fairly,we price ourselves out of reach of the very individuals we hope to help.”
Members
May 10, 2020
By Cathy Moran, Esq. (Redwood City, CA) The timeless questions asked by mankind include “why are we here“, “which came first ...” and “coffee or tea“. Bankruptcy lawyers wrestle with “which controls, b-22 or Schedules I and J“. Having argued and lost the Pak case when BAPCPA was new, and felt vindicated when
Members
April 19, 2020
By Cathy Moran, Esq. (Redwood City, CA) Mortgage forbearance for homeowners, shout the headlines. No need to make a house payment. Borrowers who can’t make this month’s mortgage payment were thrown a lifeline of sorts in the coronavirus rescue package. Only it’s probably not the help they think it is. And the lifeline may be far more fragile than they...
Members
Copy of Hildebrand-2016
December 10, 2023
An over-median Chapter 13 debtor, in calculating projected disposable income, may deduct the higher of the projected plan payment for secured debts or the IRS allowance, but the debtor may not deduct the higher payment under the original contract.
Members

Looking to Become a Member?

ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.

Webinars

These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.

Member Articles

Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.

Industry News

The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.

To get started, please let us know which of these best fits your current position: