Ask Ms. Ps & Qs

By Professor Nancy Rapoport

Dear Readers:

Remember that old expression, “in for a penny, in for a pound”? That’s the best way to capture the notion of “appearance counsel.” When a lawyer decides to be “just” appearance counsel, that lawyer is taking on some serious risk.

In large law firms, there is almost always someone who can pinch-hit at a hearing when the primary lawyer is double-booked or otherwise unavailable, and the firm represents the client, not just the individual lawyers on the matter. But what happens when a small-firm lawyer or a solo . . .

It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.

Or sign in below:

No Author Biography has been linked to this Article.

Lifting the Bar on Discharging Student Loans in Consumer Bankruptcy

Briana Johnson

April 19, 2026

We are pleased to bring another article from a Tom Vaughan Intern. Ms. Johnson does not simply look at discharging student loans, but the much broader picture of how student loans are incurred in the first place – an original perspective.

Members

Critical Case Comment

June 14, 2020

By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Chapter 13 Trustee (Nashville, TN) Chapter 13 debtor may exclude from disposable income amounts projected to be paid to an employer sponsored 401(k) where such payments are consistent with pre-filing contributions made to the retirement account. Davis v. Helbling, 2020 WL 2831172 (6th Cir. June 1, 2020) (Larsen) Case Summary In 2017, Camille Davis filed...

Members

Fraud Imputed to Partner – Bartenwerfer v. Buckley

The Honorable William Houston Brown

February 26, 2023

On February 22, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Bartenwerfer v. Buckley, 598 U.S. _____, 2023 WL 2023 WL 2144417 (Feb. 22, 2023), affirming the Ninth Circuit’s decision and resolving “confusion in the lower courts on the meaning of § 523(a)(2)(A).”1 Two Justices joined the opinion with the understanding that the Court was only addressing fraud in the context...

Members

Members of the Armed Forces Are Entitled to Certain Tax Benefits

June 23, 2019

Members of the military and their families often qualify for special tax benefits. For example, members of the armed forces don’t have to pay taxes on some types of income. In addition, special rules could lower the tax they owe or allow them more time to file and pay their federal taxes. Here are some of these special tax benefits:...

No Room for Error? Determining Whether Your “Secured” Creditor Has a Fatally Deficient UCC-1

March 22, 2020

By Lawrence R. Ahern III, Brown & Ahern (Nashville, TN) Click here for Part I Click here for Part II Part III - Description of Collateral Introduction The . . . It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members. Join Now Or sign in below: Username or Email Password Remember me...

Members

Appendix – A Review of Residential Mortgage “Stripping,” Recent Developments and the Effect of 11 U.S.C. § 1111(b)

July 18, 2021

A Brief Summary of "Strip Down" and "Strip Off" Rules Lawrence R. Ahern, III Brown & Ahern Nashville, Tennessee Most Academy readers do not need an in-depth primer on lien-stripping, but this Appendix is designed to provide a high-level summary of the most important rules involved, as interpreted by the courts since enactment of the Bankruptcy Code and as affected...

Members

Judge Appointed

The Academy

October 27, 2024

Seventh Circuit Announces the Appointment of Michael B. Slade to the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Illinois

Retirement of the Honorable Guy R. Humphrey

The Academy

February 18, 2024

Retirement of the Honorable Guy R. Humphrey

Critical Case Comment

August 1, 2021

By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Chapter 13 Standing Trustee (Nashville, TN) While the debtors failed to meet the high threshold to establish excusable neglect to permit their claim filed on behalf of a creditor after the bar date to be allowed, where a Chapter 13 case is dismissed and then reinstated prior to the expiration of the bar date, the...

Members

Court Review of Fee Applications in Chapter 13: One Judge’s Perspective

August 16, 2020

By Hon. Brian Lynch, Bankruptcy Judge, WAWB “[T]he bankruptcy court has a duty to review fee applications, notwithstanding the absence of objections by the United States trustee (“UST”), creditors, or any other interested party….” In re Busy Beaver Bldg. Ctrs., Inc., 19 F.3d 833, 841 (3d Cir. 1994). In Chapter 13 cases this role is critical because in this judge’s...

Members

Ask Ms. Ps & Qs

Link to Post:

It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.

Or sign in below:

Related Articles

Lifting the Bar on Discharging Student Loans in Consumer Bankruptcy

Critical Case Comment

Fraud Imputed to Partner – Bartenwerfer v. Buckley

Members of the Armed Forces Are Entitled to Certain Tax Benefits

No Room for Error? Determining Whether Your “Secured” Creditor Has a Fatally Deficient UCC-1

Appendix – A Review of Residential Mortgage “Stripping,” Recent Developments and the Effect of 11 U.S.C. § 1111(b)

Judge Appointed

Retirement of the Honorable Guy R. Humphrey

Critical Case Comment

Court Review of Fee Applications in Chapter 13: One Judge’s Perspective

Academy

Members

Website

Legal

Looking to Become a Member?

Webinars

Member Articles

Industry News

To get started, please let us know which of these best fits your current position: