Two Cents on 50 Cent’s Bankruptcy

By Ansley Owens, Contributing Writer and Intern for the NACTT Academy (Nashville, TN)

—-July 13, 2015, 50 Cent (a/k/a Curtis James Jackson III) submitted a petition for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Connecticut claiming his assets are about $25 million and his debts around $32 million.

Three days prior to the bankruptcy filling, a jury awarded Lastonia Leviston $5 million in a sex tape case against 50 who reportedly put a sexually explicit video of Leviston and her boyfriend online in an attempt to embarrass feuding-rival, rapper Rick Ross. Leviston is the mother to one of Rick Ross’s children.

It is implausible that 50 filed his bankruptcy for any purpose other than to halt the civil trial in New York City. He filed on the day that the punitive damages phase of the trial was to commence, and 50 even told E! News that he was “taking the precautions that any other good businessperson would take in this situation,” and filing bankruptcy “does stop things from moving forward that you don’t want moving forward.”

Arguably, these statements, at face value, are indications of bad faith and an abuse of the judicial process. Bankruptcy petitions to fend off litigation often constitute “cause” for dismissal or conversion under section 1112(b) under the Bankruptcy Code. Further pursuant to section 1129(a)(3), a debtor’s plan must be “proposed in good faith and not by any means forbidden by law.” It is unlikely that 50’s plan will meet this requirement as a debt of $1,737 owed to Curtis J. Jackson Sr., 50’s grandfather, made it on 50’s unsecured debts list.

This is not the first time 50 tried to misuse the judicial system for this sex tape case. On May 26, 2015, a bankruptcy petition was filed on behalf of SMS Promotions, LLC, a company owned by 50. U.S. District Judge Katherine Failla criticized 50 for wrongfully trying to move the sex tape case from New York State court by such means.

The most recent bankruptcy filing also failed to halt the punitive damages claim against 50. U.S. Bankruptcy Court Judge Anne M. Nevins ruled that the case would resume July 20, 2015, to consider the punitive damages despite the bankruptcy filing.

On July 21, 2015, 50 testified that he is not as wealthy as he appears claiming he makes only 10 cents for every record sold. 50 also claimed he either rents or returns the items he flashes to media and social outlets. An additional $2 million was awarded to Leviston in punitive damages despite 50’s testimony.

50 filed a statement of his financials with the bankruptcy court saying he has about $108,000 in monthly expenses. He claimed his grand Connecticut house, purchased from Mike Tyson, with its 21 bedrooms, 24 bathrooms and a nightclub costs him around $72,000 monthly. Gardening alone amounts to $5,000 a month, he says.

Under his support expenses, 50 listed a “grandparent” as receiving $2,500 from him monthly along with the $12,100 he pays in child support.

The filing also shows a loss of more than $10 million in 2013 and 2014 due to SMS Promotions and his G-Unit businesses.

To pay his expenses, 50 claimed he has a monthly income of about $184,000. The statement reveals that $3.3 million comes from his music and about $372,000 from his headphones company (SMS Promotions) so far in 2015. 50 also listed other income from touring, film, merchandising, and other revenues related to his record label G-Unit, totaling around $771,000.

Missing from this statement is 50’s income from TV and film work that he mentioned on the stand July 21. 50 reportedly made $100,000 on “Spy” and “Southpaw.” He also testified that he made $150,000 for his work in the Starz drama “Power” at that time.

During a meeting of creditors, 50 disclosed he is negotiating to lease his home in hopes of reducing monthly expenses and generating some income. We will see whether or not this attempt is successful in late August, when 50’s next bankruptcy hearing is scheduled.

____________________

HeadshotAnsley F. Owens is a contributing writer and intern with the National Association of Chapter Thirteen Trustees Academy in Nashville, Tennessee. Ms. Owens graduated from Middle Tennessee State University with a Bachelor of Science in Public Relations, and expects her Juris Doctor from Belmont University College of Law in May 2016.

While at Belmont University College of Law she serves as a Student Bar Association Senator and the Vice President of the Family Law Society. She is trained in the Harvard Negotiation Model and participates as a member of other law-related student associations. Outside the classroom she interned with MTR Family Law in Nashville, Tennessee, and was a judicial clerk for Judge Lynda Jones in General Sessions Court, Division IX in Nashville, Tennessee.

No Author Biography has been linked to this Article.

Related Articles

April 18, 2021
By Lawrence R. Ahern, III, Brown & Ahern (Nashville, TN) Introduction Analyzing the new "COVID-19 discharge" provision added to Chapter 131 by Congress on December 27 as part of the coronavirus emergency response legislation, the Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California decided in In re Ritter2 that, in order to receive such a discharge, debtors must still comply...
Members
Headshot
October 8, 2023
David A. Mawhinney is the Chapter 13 Standing Trustee for the Central and Western Divisions of Massachusetts and a Subchapter V Trustee for Region One. He replaced Denise M. Pappalardo upon her retirement which was effective December 24, 2022. David is a 2002 graduate of Boston College and received his J.D. from Boston College Law School in 2011. When David started...
rebeccaherr
April 23, 2023
In recent years, a handful of cases have discussed the issue of what happens to the trustee’s percentage fee, collected from debtor plan payments, upon the dismissal or conversion of a case prior to confirmation. This is an emerging area of law, with decisions on both sides.  However, with this new issue, there appears to be at least some confusion...
Members
March 3, 2019
By William Houston Brown, United States Bankruptcy Judge, Retired; Editor/Adviser, The Academy On April 1, 2019, an increase takes effect in those dollar amounts in the Bankruptcy Code that are subject to adjustment every three years.1 The following increases have significance in everything from the eligibility maximums for filing under Chapters 12 and 13 to the debtor’s exemptions. Relevant Official...
ahern_larry_regular
May 14, 2023
Introduction This series reviews developments in bankruptcy procedure during the past year.One new rule and amendments to 16 rules took effect December 1, 2022.  Many reflected changes necessitated by the Small Business Reorganization Act of 2019 (SBRA), and had been in place in the same or similar form on an interim basis since that legislation took effect.
Members
Merideth Akers
January 22, 2023
Who is the person sitting at that workstation? Is it Noah Non-exempt? Is it Emma Exempt? Or, is it Connie Contractor? It is vital that I know who the person is sitting at that workstation. Do I have to pay the person sitting at that workstation overtime pay? Can I reduce the person’s pay for leaving an hour early? Do...
Members
moran_cathy
August 27, 2023
The bankruptcy means test, designed to keep people out of bankruptcy, has a fatal weakness. . . . it’s health care.
Members
Academy-emeritus-Logo-gold3
January 7, 2024
As a follow-up to The Academy’s December 3, 2023, issue, three Emeritus Trustees weighed in. The 12/3/23 issue included Cathy Moran’s Chapter 13 NoLook Fees: The Horns of a Dilemma and Trustee Hildebrand’s Critical Case Comment, You Gotta Fix Your Own Screw-ups, On Your Own Dime. You may also want to take note of comments on each article and add your own. Today, we offer the thoughts of two additional Emeritus Trustees. Thus a follow-up to our follow-up. 😊
Members
judgebaxter
August 20, 2023
Passing of Retired Ohio Judge Judge Baxter was appointed United States Bankruptcy Judge for the Northern District of Ohio on December 16, 1985, and served in the Court’s Cleveland, Ohio location until his retirement in 2011. He served as Chief Judge between 2004 and 2008. Click here for obituary.
joseph 12-2024
May 8, 2022
Faced with abusive and serial bankruptcy cases,courts have fashioned various sanctions to put a stop to gaming the system. The favored sanction of the majority of courts is to enter an order of dismissal with prejudice under Section 349(a) of the Bankruptcy Code that adds a condition prohibiting refiling another bankruptcy case for a set period of time. See Lundin...
Members

Looking to Become a Member?

ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.

Webinars

These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.

Member Articles

Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.

Industry News

The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.

To get started, please let us know which of these best fits your current position: