When Things Don’t Go According to (the) Plan: Getting Out From Under Under-Funding

By Mark C. Leffler1, Boleman Law Firm P.C., Virginia Beach, VA

It is often said that the Chapter 13 plan is “the debtor’s plan”, but the truth is, most consumer debtors only want to know whether they get to keep their home and/or car, how much to pay, to whom, and when. They trust nuances in their plan--such as why some creditors receive payment in full while others may only receive a small fraction of the balance owed—to the experience and creativity of their counsel. Debtors rely on . . .

It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.

Or Sign In Below:

No Author Biography has been linked to this Article.

Critical Case Comment – Frontloading Attorney’s Fees

Henry E. Hildebrand, III

August 6, 2023

Nothing prohibits the confirmation of a Chapter 13 plan which frontloads the payment of attorney’s fees ahead of payments to secured and other creditors.

Members

Passing of Sitting Chief Judge

The Academy

December 3, 2023

District of Idaho Announces Passing of Chief Bankruptcy Judge Joseph M. Meier

Why Address Formatting Is So Important for Jurisdiction

October 24, 2021

By Jay S. Jump, CEO, CertificateofService.com (Pasco, WA) My guess is you initially saw the title of this article and promptly pressed right on past it. Who needs to learn how to properly address an envelope? You didn’t spend three years in law school plus all that money in student loans to address an envelope! But, If the purpose of...

Members

From the Editor

March 17, 2019

By Wm. Houston Brown, United States Bankruptcy Judge (Retired) Confirmation - Trustee’s “double-dipping” objection to above-median confirmation denied. The trustee objected to confirmation based on above-median debtor deducting the IRS Local Standard housing deduction when the actual mortgage expense was on a marital residence owned by the debtor’s nonfiling spouse, while also claiming the marital adjustment for the spouse’s income...

Members

Don’t Bank on Withdrawal

Cathy Moran

June 23, 2024

What do you know about FRBP 7041? Maybe younever gave it much thought. Here, Atty Moran shares her encounter with the rule which ended up at the 9th Circuit. She concluded that the “Withdraw” event on ECF enabled a trap for the unwary counsel and court.

Members

Critical Case Comment – Relief from Stay, Check; But Better Act Fast

Henry E. Hildebrand, III

August 27, 2023

A creditor having received relief from the automatic stay prior to confirmation of the debtor’s plan is nonetheless bound by the terms of the plan, once confirmed.

Members

Supreme Court Agrees to Revisit Finality of Orders in Bankruptcy

May 26, 2019

By Lawrence R. Ahern III, Brown & Ahern (Nashville, TN) Introduction In Ritzen Group, Inc. v. Jackson Masonry, LLC (In re Jackson Masonry, LLC),1 the Sixth Circuit reviewed circuit authority on finality of orders for appellate purposes and affirmed the district court's dismissal of an appeal from an order denying stay relief. The Court of Appeals said that, under 28...

Members

Tax Deductions Hidden in Chapter 13

Cathy Moran

April 3, 2022

True. Most people no longer itemize under the current Tax Code. However, the amount of money involved varies and should be considered. The same very important debts that a Chapter 13 plan pays are often tax deductible. And your client is still the person who’s paying, even if the trustee writes the check. Don’t allow them to miss out on...

Members

Critical Case Comment

March 14, 2021

By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Chapter 13 Standing Trustee for the Middle District of Tennessee (Nashville) Despite a split in authority, funds held by a Chapter 13 Trustee at the time a case is dismissed prior to confirmation, are subject to the trustee’s commission before any balance is returned to the debtor. In re Doll, 17-20831-MER (Bankr. D.Colo. Feb. 19,...

Members