Critical Case Comment

-

Link to Post:

Sokoloski v. PNC Mortgage, 2014 WL 6473810 (E.D. Cal. Nov. 18, 2014) (Shubb)

Failure of a creditor to comply with the requirements of Rule 3002.1 can state a cause of action under a state’s Unfair Competition Law, common law claim for negligence, and a state Fair Debt Collection Practices Act.

Case Summary

Ron and Dale Sokoloski fell behind on their mortgage payments and filed a Chapter 13 bankruptcy, seeking to maintain the payments and cure the default. When the Sokoloskis began to make their payments in accordance with the plan, PNC filed a notice of . . .

It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.

Or sign in below:

No Author Biography has been linked to this Article.

Related Articles

image004

How Can You Claim to Be “Creative” or “Innovative” If Your Website’s Home Page Shows a Skyline?

February 9, 2025
“Your marketing is your opportunity to set yourself apart. It’s your chance to show why you’re different — better — than your competitors.”
View Article
Members

Passing of a Legend

June 13, 2021
By Kara L. West, CPA, Chapter 12/13 Standing Trustee for the Eastern District of Tennessee (Chattanooga); Successor Trustee to C. Kenneth Still C. Kenneth Still was a legend. “Always with Barbara at this side, he epitomized qualities I think we all seek—honesty, diligence, kindness, and patience. He was a great mentor and a quick wit, and I miss him already....
View Article

ABI Commission on Consumer Bankruptcy – What Does It Mean to Surrender?

November 24, 2019
By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Chapter 13 Standing Trustee (Nashville, TN) One of the most confusing elements in consumer bankruptcy practice is the effect of electing the option given in § 1325(a)(5)(C) or § 521(a)(2). Section 521(a)(2) requires every debtor to file a statement of intent that indicates whether the debtor intends to “surrender or retain” estate property which secured...
View Article
Members
kevinanderson

Consumers Are Consuming Cash at an Unsustainable Rate

June 26, 2022
Consumers have burned through their stimulus cash and are now drawing down their savings to satisfy pent up spending sprees and to cover the increasing cost of living. This cannot continue. From 2015 through the end of 2019, consumers held a consistent average of $1.1 trillion in savings. However, with the commencement of the COVID pandemic and the first of...
View Article
Members

A Confirmed Plan with a Marijuana Wrinkle

May 19, 2019
By Gretchen D. Holland, Standing Chapter 13 Trustee for the Greenville/Spartanburg Division of South Carolina Although this is a chapter 11 case, it has chapter 13 implications because the confirmation requirement that a plan be “proposed in good faith and not by any means forbidden by law” is identical in both chapters (§ 1129(a)(3) and § 1325(a)(3)). Garvin v. Cook...
View Article
Members
moran_cathy

Unjust Enrichment:  Where Are We Headed?

March 2, 2025
A recent decision from a Hawaii bankruptcy court, inched closer to a slippery slope on the hill of nondischargeabilty, expanding the Supreme Court's Bartenwerfer decision. See also: Unjust Enrichment from Spouse’s Defalcation Leads to a Nondischargeable Debt By Leee Miyahira, Extern, Office of Nima Ghazvini (Honolulu, HI)
View Article
Members
Jeffrey-Fraser

Some Federal Protections are Stronger Than Others – Sovereign Immunity, Criminal Restitution, and the Automatic Stay

August 13, 2023
In this brief synopsis, Fraser compares Lac du Flambeauto a case from the Middle District Court of North Carolina and its connection to the automatic stay.
View Article
Members

From the Editor

March 17, 2019
By Wm. Houston Brown, United States Bankruptcy Judge (Retired) Confirmation - Bankruptcy court could not sua sponte object to confirmation. Distinguishing between “self-executing” provisions of the Code and those sections that were not “self-executing,” and discussing Espinosa’s impact on that distinction, District Court held that the bankruptcy court could not sua sponte object to confirmation based on the above- median...
View Article
Members
gustafson2

SCOTUS Cases Every Bankruptcy Lawyer Should Know Part 2 of 8

November 9, 2025
In the continually evolving field of consumer bankruptcy law, a series of Supreme Court decisions shape how cases are administered nationwide. Over the coming months, we will highlight key decisions that every bankruptcy practitioner should recognize—both by name and by the issues they resolve. This week’s ‘memory work’ is: Taylor v. Freeland & Kronz, Law v. Siegel, Hamilton v. Lanning, and Butner v. US.
View Article
Members
headshot

I Think I Saw a Ghost

August 16, 2026
When does a helpful hand behind the scenes become an attorney hiding in the shadows? Ghostwriting may be friendly—or it may be fraud waiting to be exposed.
View Article
Members

Looking to Become a Member?

ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.

Webinars

These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.

Member Articles

Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.

Industry News

The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.

To get started, please let us know which of these best fits your current position:

Attorney
Trustee
Non-Profit
Government