Critical Case Comment

Sokoloski v. PNC Mortgage, 2014 WL 6473810 (E.D. Cal. Nov. 18, 2014) (Shubb)

Failure of a creditor to comply with the requirements of Rule 3002.1 can state a cause of action under a state’s Unfair Competition Law, common law claim for negligence, and a state Fair Debt Collection Practices Act.

Case Summary

Ron and Dale Sokoloski fell behind on their mortgage payments and filed a Chapter 13 bankruptcy, seeking to maintain the payments and cure the default. When the Sokoloskis began to make their payments in accordance with the plan, PNC filed a notice of . . .

It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.

Or sign in below:

No Author Biography has been linked to this Article.

The Neglected Non-dischargeability Provision

Cathy Moran

December 7, 2025

CATHY’S BACK!! CATHY’S BACK!!!!! After a brief absence, we are pleased as punch to have Cathy Moran back in our author rotation. Welcome back, Cathy. You have been missed. Hands up, everyone who has encountered a claim that a debt is non-dischargeable by reason of §523(a)(14). So, what’s this about credit cards and taxes?

Members

Critical Case Comment – Debtor’s Counsel’s Fee Reduced to $48k

Henry E. Hildebrand, III

February 4, 2022

Chapter 13 debtor’s counsel’s fee award was reduced to $48,116 from the requested $95,480 due to pre-petition payments, confusing and “lumped” time entries, and excessive hourly rates for some services performed, even though the debtor’s Chapter 13 plan was never even proposed much less confirmed. The debtor never attended a meeting of creditors, but the debtor managed to recover his...

Members

Musings from a Hapless BAP Law Clerk: Part 2 – Finding the Right Case to Appeal: Finality and Standing

M. Jonathan Hayes

June 22, 2025

This week, Attorney Hayes brings readers an excellent outline on finality and standing. “. . . . final order is a strange animal in the bankruptcy world.”

Members

Critical Case Comment–“No Realistic Future Prospects”

Henry E. Hildebrand, III

March 26, 2023

A 34-year-old Chapter 7 debtor could discharge his student loan obligation by establishing that he could not reasonably make payments on the balance, could not maintain a reasonable standard of living, and because the expiration of his payment term had already passed, his standard of living was likely to persist, with no realistic future prospects. (Silverstein) In re Wolfson, No....

Members

Serendipity, a Tribute to Judge Jack B. Schmetterer

March 14, 2021

By Mark S. Wheeler, Staff Attorney to M.O. Marshall, Standing Chapter 13 Trustee (Chicago, IL) (Used with expressed permission. Published February 2021 in the Northern District of Illinois Bankruptcy Court Liaison Committee Newsletter.) Despite appearing before the Senior Bankruptcy Judge for the Northern District of Illinois perhaps hundreds of times over the last 29 years, I was uncharacteristically nervous to...

How I Got Started

George Stevenson

May 8, 2022

My life in 1982 was in a bit of turmoil. I had recently gotten married and was working as in-house counsel for a regional furniture retailer. My position included a lot of collection work – beating up on debtors in state and bankruptcy courts. I was not unhappy but I was not comfortable with my work – it was clear...

Can a Secured Claim Still “Ride-Through” Bankruptcy Despite BAPCPA? – Part 1 In re Rhodes Says, “Let Me Count the Ways”

Lawrence R. Ahern, III

January 30, 2022

Background A recent Chapter 7 case out of the Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of California, In re Rhodes,1 addresses reaffirmation in a context that is very significant and should be of interest to all debtor's attorneys. It points out that the "ride-through" of a debtor's secured debt in Chapter 7—which Congress tried to eliminate in 2005—still exists. In...

Members

Converting Debtors Must Pay Close Attention to Tax Return Filing Deadlines

Jason Wilson-Aguilar

May 31, 2026

“A recent decision from the Western District of Washington held that the clock starts with the first meeting of creditors scheduled in the case. . .”

Members

Baird v. Matlack – A Primer on Crypto

Regina Logsdon

May 17, 2026

Matlack should be a go-to resource for any consumer practitioner who only sees cryptocurrency on an infrequent basis. Judge Isgur wrote an excellent explanation of how cryptocurrencies can work in an average person’s life.

Members

IRS Issues Standard Mileage Rates For 2019

January 6, 2019

IRS issued the 2019 optional standard mileage rates used to calculate the deductible costs of operating an automobile for business, charitable, medical or moving purposes. Beginning on Jan. 1, 2019, the standard mileage rates for the use of a car (also vans, pickups or panel trucks) will be: 58 cents per mile driven for business use, up 3.5 cents from...

Critical Case Comment

Link to Post:

It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.

Or sign in below:

Related Articles

The Neglected Non-dischargeability Provision

Critical Case Comment – Debtor’s Counsel’s Fee Reduced to $48k

Musings from a Hapless BAP Law Clerk: Part 2 – Finding the Right Case to Appeal: Finality and Standing

Critical Case Comment–“No Realistic Future Prospects”

Serendipity, a Tribute to Judge Jack B. Schmetterer

How I Got Started

Can a Secured Claim Still “Ride-Through” Bankruptcy Despite BAPCPA? – Part 1 In re Rhodes Says, “Let Me Count the Ways”

Converting Debtors Must Pay Close Attention to Tax Return Filing Deadlines

Baird v. Matlack – A Primer on Crypto

IRS Issues Standard Mileage Rates For 2019

Academy

Members

Website

Legal

Looking to Become a Member?

Webinars

Member Articles

Industry News

To get started, please let us know which of these best fits your current position: