The NACTT Academy offers a comprehensive community for bankruptcy professionals seeking to advance their education in consumer bankruptcy.
ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
Critical Case Comment
Print This Article
Link to Post:
Sokoloski v. PNC Mortgage, 2014 WL 6473810 (E.D. Cal. Nov. 18, 2014) (Shubb)
Failure of a creditor to comply with the requirements of Rule 3002.1 can state a cause of action under a state’s Unfair Competition Law, common law claim for negligence, and a state Fair Debt Collection Practices Act.
Case Summary
Ron and Dale Sokoloski fell behind on their mortgage payments and filed a Chapter 13 bankruptcy, seeking to maintain the payments and cure the default. When the Sokoloskis began to make their payments in accordance with the plan, PNC filed a notice of . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
Personal Injury Attorney’s Duty of Reasonable Inquiry of a Client’s Bankruptcy
Foreclosure Sales as Fraudulent Transfers: Study Summary
Quick Confirmation – BAP Says Not So Fast
Sneak Attack on Consumer Rights
Find The Hidden Mortgage Interest Tax Deduction in Bankruptcy
Critical Case Comment – Ignoring 3002.1 Will Cost You
Meet a New Trustee
The “Snapshot” Rule – Part 1: The Circuits Begin to Line Up
Some Federal Protections are Stronger Than Others – Sovereign Immunity, Criminal Restitution, and the Automatic Stay
NACTT 2024 Annual Roundtable