From the Editor – Discharge and Dischargeability • NACTT Academy

From the Editor – Discharge and Dischargeability

By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired)

Failure to comply with divorce obligations was willful and malicious injury. Chapter 7 debtor’s repeated refusal to comply with divorce decree’s requirement for him to transfer marital assets to his ex-wife was a willful and malicious injury for purposes of § 523(a)(6). There was an objective substantial certainty of harm to the former spouse by the debtor’s failures. Shankle v. Shankle (In re Shankle), ___ Fed.Appx. ____, 2014 WL 486208 (5th Cir. Feb. 7, 2014).

________________________________

The Honorable William Houston Brown . . .

It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.

Or Sign In Below:

No Author Biography has been linked to this Article.

From the Editor – Discharge

June 7, 2020

By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired) Hardship discharge denied. Section 1328(b)’s requirements for hardship discharge are conjunctive and failure to satisfy any one of three conditions results in denial. Reviewing judicial decisions on requirements of the statute, the court considered “the extent of a debtor’s accountability and degree of control; the substantiality and foreseeability of the changed circumstances at...

Members

Important Research Survey

The Academy

December 10, 2023

As a professional in an occupation that may often interface with people handling life disruptions (e.g., divorce/separation, unemployment, mortgage foreclosure) you are being asked to participate in a study being conducted by the University of Southern California.

Meet A Newish Trustee

July 28, 2019

Tiffany M. Cornejo was appointed as the Chapter 13 Standing Trustee for the District of New Mexico on December 1, 2017. She took the reins from retiring Kelley Skehen. Ms. Cornejo received her Bachelor of Science in Journalism (B.S.J.) degree at the University of Kansas in Lawrence in 2002 and remained there to obtain her Juris Doctor in 2005. She...

Annulment of the Automatic Stay: A Concept Whose Time Has Come – And Gone

June 21, 2020

By Academy Staff The Automatic Stay is one of the most fundamental aspects of the Bankruptcy Code, providing a Chapter 7 Trustee “breathing room” to investigate Debtor’s financial affairs; and providing Debtors in Chapter 13 time to formulate and confirm a Chapter 13 Plan without facing the imminent loss of assets. Equally important, most Courts have concluded that actions in...

Members

Fulton’s Aftermath – What Do Chapter 13 Practitioners Need To Know?

January 31, 2021

By Nathan E. Curtis and Peter Francis Geraci, Geraci Law L.L.C. Debtors who are not current on mortgage or vehicle payments may file for Chapter 13 relief and propose to cure arrears, and force creditors to accept future payments. Mortgage creditors must give multiple notices before taking real estate away from a debtor, but vehicle creditors are allowed to repossess...

Members

Game Stop: Dismissals with Prejudice

Michael B. Joseph

May 8, 2022

Faced with abusive and serial bankruptcy cases,courts have fashioned various sanctions to put a stop to gaming the system. The favored sanction of the majority of courts is to enter an order of dismissal with prejudice under Section 349(a) of the Bankruptcy Code that adds a condition prohibiting refiling another bankruptcy case for a set period of time. See Lundin...

Members

“Lien Stripping” Based on Claim Disallowance by Default: Ninth Circuit Clarifies its Rule

June 7, 2020

By Lawrence R. Ahern III, Brown & Ahern (Nashville, TN) Introduction Chapter 13 practitioners certainly do not need to be told that a lender with a mortgage1 on the debtor's principal residence has a special position in a Chapter 13 case. A chapter 13 plan may "modify the rights of holders of secured claims, other than a claim secured only...

Members

Critical Case Comment – You Can’t Have Your Cake and Eat it Too

Henry E. Hildebrand, III

December 10, 2023

An over-median Chapter 13 debtor, in calculating projected disposable income, may deduct the higher of the projected plan payment for secured debts or the IRS allowance, but the debtor may not deduct the higher payment under the original contract.

Members

From the Editor – Claims

October 20, 2019

By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired) Claimant in proof of claim lacking prima facie validity was sanctioned. The proof of claim secured by the debtor’s residence failed to satisfy Rule 3001(c)(2)(C) requirements, including incomplete Form B 410A with no payment history. The claimant’s attempt to amend the claim on the eve of the contested objection to claim would defeat...

Members

Buy Now/Pay Later – When the Bill Comes Due

Neil Lloyd Enmark

October 22, 2023

This quick read has something for everyone. “The services are convenient for consumers and probably encourage impulse buying.” More from this author: Post-Confirmation Property & Income Changes

Members