By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Chapter 13 Trustee (Nashville, TN) There is no requirement to show a change in circumstance in order to modify a Chapter 13 plan pursuant to § 1329. Whaley v. Guillen (In re Guillen), 2020 WL 5015287 (11th Cir. Aug. 25, 2020) (Marcus) Case Summary Rachel Guillen filed a Chapter 13 petition in August of 2015....
Critical Case Comment
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Chapter 13 Trustee for the Middle District of Tennessee
In re Rogers, 494 B.R. 664 (Bankr. E.D. N.C., July 8, 2013) (Leonard). A mortgage obligation treated in a debtors’ plan as current and paid directly by the debtors is nonetheless discharged pursuant to 11 U.S.C. 1328(a) and the mortgage creditor cannot pursue the deficiency that might have accrued when the debtors subsequently defaulted on their payments.
Case Summary
The debtors filed their Chapter 13 petition in November of 2008. At that time, the . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or sign in below:
Related Articles
Ask Ms. Ps & Qs
No Gracie, LLCs May Not File Chapter 13
Critical Case Comment – In the Windfalls Category
Critical Case Comment–IRS and the “Innocent Spouse”
Meet an AO Trustee
For Shame
Generative A.I. – Be Afraid, Be Very Afraid
A Fireside Chat with Dr. ChatGPT – Hallucinations
Critical Case Comment
Credit Scores Trend Upward After Bankruptcy