United Student Aid Funds, Inc v. Espinosa, 560 U.S. ---, 130 S.Ct. 1367 (2010) • NACTT Academy

United Student Aid Funds, Inc v. Espinosa, 560 U.S. —, 130 S.Ct. 1367 (2010)

By Professor M. Jonathan Hayes

Issue: Is “an order [confirming a chapter 13 plan] that confirms the discharge of a student loan debt in the absence of an undue hardship finding or an adversary proceeding, or both, … a void judgment for Rule 60(b)(4) purposes”?

Holding: No

Justice Clarence Thomas for a unanimous court,

This chapter 13 debtor’s plan proposed to pay only the principle on a student loan and provided that the remainder, the accrued interest, would be discharged upon payment of the principle. No adversary proceeding was commenced and the court was not asked to . . .

It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.

Or Sign In Below:

No Author Biography has been linked to this Article.

Meet the First Black Woman to Serve as Chief Judge for Federal Bankruptcy Court in Cleveland

The Academy

February 4, 2024

February is Black History Month and it’s a time to recognize the past but also honor those who are achieving great things today.

Safeguarding the Promise of a Fresh Start: Utilizing RESPA to Challenge Mortgage Servicing Errors Post-Discharge

Stephen F. Relyea

July 10, 2022

For many of the consumer debtors my firm represents, the primary purpose of filing bankruptcy is to save their home or other real estate from being foreclosed upon by their mortgage servicer. We help those debtors file and comply with chapter 13 plans that propose to resolve their defaulted mortgages in a variety of ways, which might include curing pre-petition...

Members

NEW SCAM ALERT . . . this one is going to attorneys

The Academy

November 10, 2024

NEW SCAM ALERT. . . this one is going to attorneys Electronic Filing Scam Targets Attorneys – NEW INFORMATION

Critical Case Comment

February 24, 2019

By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Chapter 13 Standing Trustee for the Middle District of Tennessee (Nashville) It was impermissible and contrary to the provisions of the Bankruptcy Code for the bankruptcy clerk to enter an order which dismissed a Chapter 13 case based only upon the trustee’s certification that the debtor did not make a timely first payment. (Duncan). No...

Members

Do Not Despair: The Challenge of Declining Chapter 13 Caseloads

The NACTT Emeritus Trustees

October 20, 2024

We asked our NACTT Emeritus Trustees to comment on the troublesome trend of fewer chapter 13 case filings. Years of experience provides helpful insight for trustees and consumer bankruptcy attorneys.

Members

District of South Carolina

The Academy

May 28, 2023

Retirement of Judge David Robert Duncan

What IS a Principal Residence?

June 30, 2019

By Phil Lamos, Chief Legal Counsel, Office of the Chapter 13 Trustee Lauren A. Helbling (Cleveland, OH) Section 1322(b)(2) of the Bankruptcy Code states that a Chapter 13 plan may not modify a claim that is “secured only by a security interest in real property that is the debtor’s principal residence.” But the inverse of this statute is true; if...

Members

2022 Bankruptcy Procedure Year in Review: Revised Statute and Rules and Selected Cases – Part 4 More on Arbitration Procedure

Lawrence R. Ahern, III

January 15, 2023

Introduction This series reviews developments in bankruptcy procedure during 2022. Amendments to 16 rules and new one new rule took effect December 1, 2022. Many reflected changes necessitated by the Small Business Reorganization Act of 2019 (SBRA),1 and have been in place in the same or similar form on an interim basis since that legislation took effect.

Members

Sixth Circuit Selects Douglas L. Lutz as Bankruptcy Judge for the Eastern District of Kentucky

The Academy

April 28, 2024

The Circuit Executive for the Sixth Circuit announces that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit has selected Douglas L. Lutz as Bankruptcy Judge for the Eastern District of Kentucky to fill the vacancy created by the retirement of Bankruptcy Judge Tracey N. Wise. He took the oath of office on April 19, 2024.

From the Editor – Confirmation

March 8, 2020

By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired) Equal monthly payments and attorney fees. The secured creditor objected to confirmation on basis that the plan improperly deferred its payments until debtor’s attorney fees were paid, and the District Court affirmed confirmation that delayed start of secured equal monthly payments for 21 months. The opinion examines three approaches to the issue: 1)...

Members