CRITICAL CASE COMMENT: Dickson v Countrywide Home Loans

By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Chapter 13 Standing Trustee for the Middle District of Tennessee

Dickson v Countrywide Home Loans, (Case 10-5580, 6th Cir, August 26, 2011) (Griffin)

Chapter 13 debtors have direct standing to void liens created by pre-petition default judgments which would impair the exemptions of such debtors.

Case Summary

In 1998, Nancy Dickson borrowed money from Countrywide, executing a promissory note and a mortgage on her real property. The mortgage stated that Countrywide had a lien against real property and “all improvements now or hereafter erected on . . .

It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.

Or Sign In Below:

No Author Biography has been linked to this Article.

Bankruptcy Lawyer Must Have Otherworldly Powers

Cathy Moran

November 5, 2023

Just for fun . . .

Members

Getting Over the Finish Line: Not So Fast

Michael B. Joseph

January 26, 2025

It looks like the Debtor has completed all plan payments, that the plan is fully consummated, and the debtor is ready for discharge and closing of the bankruptcy case. Not so fast. There may be matters remaining that need to be addressed to get over the finish line. Attorney Joseph offers subscribers a checklist of potential issues that could inhibit discharge.

Members

Procedural Enlargement of Claims Bar Date

Jitwan K. Floyd

June 2, 2024

Rule 3002 outlines requirements and offers remedies for untimely claims, giving bankruptcy judges discretion to grant relief. However, creditors should view these exceptions as corrective measures rather than substantial rights.

Members

Unscheduled Creditor May Not File a Late Proof of Claim

July 14, 2019

By Beverly M. Burden, Standing Chapter 13 Trustee (Lexington, KY) An unscheduled creditor without notice of the bankruptcy case was denied an extension of time to file a proof of claim pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 3002(c)(6)(A) in a recent opinion from the Eastern District of Kentucky. In the case of In re Fryman,1 the debtor did not include creditor Kentucky...

Members

8th Circuit Kills SAVE Program Disallowing Loan Forgiveness

Scott Waterman

February 23, 2025

This decision will completely upend the income driven student loan landscape, impacting over 8 million student loan borrowers who were enrolled in those programs. The injunction also impacts Chapter 13.

Members

How Does an Idea Become a Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure?

Hon. Rebecca B. Connelly

August 4, 2024

This week, Judge Connelly brings Academy subscribers a real treat. Got a rule change idea? Learn how you can help shape the process. Submit your suggestions and be part of the evolution of bankruptcy procedure!

Members

Creditors’ Rights and Debtors’ Protections at the Intersection of Consumer Bankruptcy and UCC Article 9

November 29, 2020

By Lawrence R. Ahern III, Brown & Ahern (Nashville, TN) PART VI – CONSUMER FORECLOSURE PROCEDURES (CONCLUSION) Introduction In the consumer bankruptcy field, trustees and debtors' counsel often are uncomfortable with the rules in Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC). In this series for the NACTT Academy, we have looked at numerous topics involving the interplay of Article...

Members

Ask Ms. Ps and Qs

March 15, 2020

By Professor Nancy Rapoport, University of Nevada Dear Readers: The marvelous, indefatigable Regina Logsdon just forwarded me this hypothetical: Post-confirmation, debtor/client gets upset with attorney. Let’s assume for this scenario that the attorney hasn’t done anything wrong – perhaps just a difference of opinion on a plan modification (or not). Debtor/client says ugly things to attorney – name-calling, etc. THEN...

Members

Assumption of Auto Lease in Chapter 7 Requires No Court Approval Says the 9th Circuit: In re Bobka

May 9, 2021

By Matthew D. Resnik, Resnik Hayes Moradi, LLP (Encino, CA) In Bobka v. Toyota Motor Credit Corporation (In re Bobka), 968 F.3d 946 (9th Cir. August, 2020), the chapter 7 debtor wanted to retain her leased Toyota. Toyota sent her an "assumption agreement" which she signed and returned to Toyota the day before she received her discharge. By then she...

Members

United Student Aid Funds, Inc. v. Espinosa Ten Years After

May 3, 2020

By Hon. Brian Lynch, United States Bankruptcy Judge, Western District of Washington, Tacoma Division When the Supreme Court issued United Student Aid Funds, Inc. v. Espinosa1 on March 23, 2010, commentators were perplexed.2 On the one hand, the Court upheld the 9th Circuit’s ruling allowing a hardship discharge of student loans in a chapter 13 plan. The Court held that...

Members