By Lawrence R. Ahern III, Brown & Ahern (Nashville, TN) Introduction On March 20, 2019, the Supreme Court ruled unanimously in Obduskey v. McCarthy & Holthus LLP1 that actions required by state law in a nonjudicial foreclosure are not regulated by the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA).2 The decision resolved a split in the circuits. In addition to the...
From the Editor – Dismissal
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired)
Chapter 13 debtor had absolute right to dismiss. Facing a contested confirmation hearing, the debtor moved to dismiss the case, and his estranged spouse objected. Concluding that § 1307(b) provides an absolute right to dismiss a case that had not been previously converted, the court posed questions about whether there should be limits on this dismissal right, for example, when the debtor had engaged in bad faith actions. With no facts to establish an exception from the statute’s “shall dismiss” language, such questions were reserved for another day . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or sign in below:
Related Articles
Deconstructing the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act: Obduskey Says Lawyers Conducting Nonjudicial Foreclosure Are Not “Debt Collectors”
BOLO Alert: Community Property in Unexpected Places
What About Conditional Confirmation?
2019 Legislation Affecting Bankruptcy Practice
From the Editor
Critical Case Comment – New Bankruptcy Term – “Sale Plan”
Separately Classifying Student Loans in Chapter 13
Critical Case Comment – Service Counts
Employers Who Provide Leave Might Qualify to Claim Valuable Credit
Who Is Stupid Here?