Debtor’s Counsel’s Duty of Due Diligence – Did the Attorney Seek From the Debtor, and Then Review, Whatever Documents Were Within the Debtor’s Possession, Custody or Control in Order to Verify the Information Provided By the Debtor? Pt. 3

By: Fredrick E. Clement. Mr. Clement is a Certified Specialist in Bankruptcy Law by The State Bar of California Board of Legal Specialization.
“[D]id the attorney seek from the debtor, and then review, whatever documents were within the debtor’s possession, custody or control in order to verify the information provided by the debtor”? (In re Withrow, 391 B.R. 217 (Bankr. D. Mass. 2008), aff’d, 405 B.R. 505 (1st Cir. BAP 2009))

Poet Robert Browning once observed that “less is more.” Apparently Mr. Browning, was not thinking of the duty of due diligence, where more is . . .

It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.

Or sign in below:

No Author Biography has been linked to this Article.

Timing Is Everything

Henry E. Hildebrand, III

March 22, 2026

Where state law provides a homestead exemption to proceeds generated from the sale of a debtor’s homestead for a period of one year following the sale, the exemption would be allowed even if the debtors do not intend to devote these proceeds to obtain a substitute home.

Members

From 5 Divisions to 4 Grandchildren, 3+ pets, 2 Hobbies and 1 Private Practice: The “Retirement” of Robert Wilson

Katherine L. Davis

March 20, 2022

“The trouble with retirement is that you never get a day off!” [Abe Lemons] There is no better way to describe Robert Wilson in his career as an attorney, as a trustee, in his life thus far, and surely in his retirement! He has filled and will continue to fill every second of every day with meaning and purpose and...

From the Editor – Claims

February 9, 2020

By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired) Unreasonable fees for proof of claim. $4,000 fee for private mortgagee’s proof of claim and objection to proposed plan was unreasonable, and creditor was denied recovery of $7,500 attorney fee for responding to debtor’s objection to proof of claim. The Court considered Fannie Mae’s guidelines for maximum fees related to proof of claim...

Members

Escrow 102 – Part 1 of 4

September 26, 2021

By Michael J. McCormick, Esq., McCalla Raymer Leibert Pierce, LLC (Roswell, GA) Escrow 101 – Part 1 Escrow 101 - Part 2 Escrow 101 – Part 3 Escrow 102 – Part 2

Members

Eviction and Bankruptcy Remedies

August 30, 2020

By Wayne Silver, Wayne Silver Law (Redwood City, CA) The 120-day CARES Act eviction moratorium expired on Saturday, July 25. At the expiration of the moratorium, landlords covered by the federal moratorium could begin serving eviction notices, and begin filing eviction lawsuits 30 days thereafter. That means on Monday, August 24, 2020 the moratorium on evictions expired, while we face...

Members

The Case for Conduit Mortgage Payments

Max Gardner

January 23, 2022

Max Gardner’s Top Ten Reasons The late Waylon Jennings had a hit song years ago called “Sick and Tired of Getting Up Sick and Tired.” The song related to the chronic consumption of alcohol but the analogy to the need for a mandatory rule for mortgage payments through the Chapter 13 Trustee is not that far-fetched. As a debtor’s attorney...

Members

Spectacularly Successful Chapter 13 Cases

The NACTT Emeritus Trustees

September 28, 2025

We asked the NACTT Emeritus Trustees for their memories of particularly successful cases. Of course, success has various meanings. We think you will enjoy this item.

Members

Word to the Wise: Failure to Properly Notice a Creditor Is Bad!

M. Jonathan Hayes

April 7, 2024

When the debtor fails to properly schedule a creditor in an asset case, is the now non-dischargeable debt under § 523(a)(3) limited to the amount the creditor would have received had it filed a proof of claim?

Members

Is a CARES Act Stimulus Payment Exempt?

April 26, 2020

By Lawrence R. Ahern, III, Brown & Ahern (Nashville, TN) Introduction Since April 1, 2020, many unemployed people in the United States have begun to receive "a recovery benefit" in the amount of $1,200.1 These payments, under the CARES Act2 stimulus program, were intended to provide some relief to suffering Americans. However, the most financially distressed Americans, perhaps with existing,...

Members

Critical Case Comment – Fourth Circuit Says Easy-Peasy

Henry E. Hildebrand, III

September 24, 2023

In calculating projected disposable income, 13 debtor may deduct entire mortgage payment notwithstanding amount exceeds the housing allowance as established by the IRS Financial Standards Allowance.

Members

Debtor’s Counsel’s Duty of Due Diligence – Did the Attorney Seek From the Debtor, and Then Review, Whatever Documents Were Within the Debtor’s Possession, Custody or Control in Order to Verify the Information Provided By the Debtor? Pt. 3

Link to Post:

It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.

Or sign in below:

Related Articles

Timing Is Everything

From 5 Divisions to 4 Grandchildren, 3+ pets, 2 Hobbies and 1 Private Practice: The “Retirement” of Robert Wilson

From the Editor – Claims

Escrow 102 – Part 1 of 4

Eviction and Bankruptcy Remedies

The Case for Conduit Mortgage Payments

Spectacularly Successful Chapter 13 Cases

Word to the Wise: Failure to Properly Notice a Creditor Is Bad!

Is a CARES Act Stimulus Payment Exempt?

Critical Case Comment – Fourth Circuit Says Easy-Peasy

Academy

Members

Website

Legal

Looking to Become a Member?

Webinars

Member Articles

Industry News

To get started, please let us know which of these best fits your current position: