The NACTT Academy offers a comprehensive community for bankruptcy professionals seeking to advance their education in consumer bankruptcy.
ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
Critical Case Comment – Giesbrecht v. Fitzgerald (In re Giesbrecht), 2010 WL 1956618 (9th Cir. BAP, April 28, 2010) (Hollowell)
Print This Article
Link to Post:
Giesbrecht v. Fitzgerald (In re Giesbrecht), 2010 WL 1956618 (9th Cir. BAP, April 28, 2010) (Hollowell)
Nothing prohibits a Chapter 13 plan from providing for direct payments to a creditor by a debtor, such is within the sound discretion of the bankruptcy court.
Summary of the Case
The debtors filed a Chapter 13 plan proposing to maintain direct payments to Whidby Island Bank paying for their 2006 Honda. They were current on their payments to the bank . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
Preferences: When does the Clock Start Running?
Passing of a Legend
Assumption of Auto Lease in Chapter 7 Requires No Court Approval Says the 9th Circuit: In re Bobka
Meet the Newest Trustee
A Day in the Life of a Chapter 13 Trustee
When $400 Emergency Pushes You Over the Edge
United Student Aid Funds, Inc. v. Espinosa Ten Years After
What Else Does the Code Say About Interest and Unsecured Debts?
Critical Case Comment – Although a Mess, Month-to-Month Lease Assumed
Fulton’s Aftermath – What Do Chapter 13 Practitioners Need To Know?