Leaders Must Take Action to Halt Foreclosure Crisis for Minorities

NCLC’s Executive Director Rich Dubois and NAACP President and CEO Derrick Johnson are calling on Congress and federal regulators to take action to prevent an impending foreclosure crisis in communities of color, in an opinion editorial published yesterday in The Hill.

The op-ed highlights how the cumulative impact of decades of housing policy discrimination on African American homeownership, coupled with the disproportionate economic burdens borne by communities of color as a result of the coronavirus pandemic, have set the stage for a tidal wave of mortgage delinquencies and foreclosures in African American and Latinx communities. A recent survey by the Census Bureau found that while 4% of white homeowners said they did not pay their mortgage in the last month, 13% of African American homeowners and 9% of Latinx homeowners said they missed their mortgage payment. These gaps are likely to widen as unemployment insurance payments wane.

Even more troubling, African American homeowners were three times more likely than white homeowners to say that they could not pay their mortgage, but African American homeowners were only twice as likely to report that their mortgage payments were deferred by their mortgage company. This deferral process is a critical means of assistance that could help homeowners avoid foreclosure, keep their homes, and build generational wealth.

NCLC and its partners have been sounding the alarm on the upcoming foreclosure crisis for months, and yesterday’s op-ed is the latest in our calls for relief for struggling homeowners. While the CARES Act provided some important temporary protections from foreclosure, more action is needed by Congress and federal regulators to prevent a flood of preventable foreclosures and bankruptcies, and to promote racial equity. Specifically:

  • The U.S. Senate must expand CARES Act mortgage protections and allow for automatic forbearances to protect delinquent borrowers from foreclosure (which is already included in the HEROES Act passed by the U.S. House). Additionally, there is a desperate need for civil legal aid services, housing counseling, and other targeted interventions into communities hardest hit by foreclosure.
  • Federal regulators, such as the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, must preserve and strengthen civil rights protections, including laws against “disparate impact.” They also should collect data and provide free public reports on developments in the mortgage market, including whether policies result in unfair disparities for African American and Latinx homeowners.
  • Mortgage companies should be required to offer affordable repayment options for homeowners catching up on missed payments, and should notify borrowers of their options in English and in notices for borrowers with limited English proficiency.

In short, it is up to America’s leaders to take immediate action to protect African American and Latinx communities from widespread foreclosure and additional loss of wealth, and to begin mitigating the effects of decades of discrimination and disinvestment.

Thank you as always for being in this fight with us, and for all you do to advocate for racial justice and economic opportunity.

No Author Biography has been linked to this Article.

Related Articles

May 5, 2019
By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Chapter 13 Standing Trustee (Nashville, TN) Section I. Student Loans, Part II – Suggested Regulatory and Judicial Changes In our last installment of the Academy Report on the ABI Commission on Consumer Bankruptcy we dealt with the ABI Commission’s suggested statutory modifications which could address some of the problems facing borrowers confronted with substantial student...
Members
February 9, 2020
By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired) Unreasonable fees for proof of claim. $4,000 fee for private mortgagee’s proof of claim and objection to proposed plan was unreasonable, and creditor was denied recovery of $7,500 attorney fee for responding to debtor’s objection to proof of claim. The Court considered Fannie Mae’s guidelines for maximum fees related to proof of claim...
Members
Mark
October 15, 2023
“Why do I need the FDCPA if there’s already a remedy under Rule 3001?” This is what the bankruptcy judge asked me when I brought an adversary proceeding against a claims buyer, alleging potential class claims under both the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”) and Bankruptcy Rule 3001(c)(2). The defendant had a business practice of filing high volumes of...
Members
September 12, 2021
By Michael J. McCormick, Esq., McCalla Raymer Leibert Pierce, LLC (Roswell, GA) Escrow 101 – Part 1 Escrow 101 – Part 3 Escrow 102 – Part 1 Escrow 102 – Part 2
Members
justicedepartment
September 3, 2023
These virtual 341 meetings via Zoom will be implemented on a rolling basis through early 2024.
May 16, 2021
By Cathy Moran, Esq., (Redwood City, CA) Have I got a story for you. A rousing tale of schedules, hearings, frustrations, and ultimately fortunes, traceable to a good story in the fee application. Maybe that's a bit overblown, but I'm telling this story with a purpose. Good stories lead to fair compensation for bankruptcy attorneys. Fee applications aren't hard Filing...
Members
November 22, 2020
By M. Jonathan Hayes We are now eight months into the Small Business Reorganization Act of 2019, which took effect in February. The act attempted to establish a cheaper, quicker route for small businesses to reorganize under new Subchapter V of the bankruptcy code. Here are a few of my observations over the past several months. First, some small businesses...
January 10, 2021
By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired) This legislation includes several bankruptcy-related provisions, in addition to government funding and other COVID relief. Consumer bankruptcy issues are addressed in Title X of the Act, section 1001, which amends Bankruptcy Code § 541(b)’s exclusions from property of the estate, adding subsection 11 for certain coronavirus relief, defined as “recovery rebates made under...
Members
Jeffrey-Fraser
August 13, 2023
In this brief synopsis, Fraser compares Lac du Flambeauto a case from the Middle District Court of North Carolina and its connection to the automatic stay.
Members
NN Photo
March 5, 2023
In a recent opinion, an Ohio bankruptcy court joined the majority of other courts by holding the Code excludes Social Security Act (“SSA”) benefits from disposable income.i The issue was brought before the Court by the Chapter 13 Trustee’s objection to confirmation. The objection to confirmation asserted the Debtors failed to commit all disposable income to their plan and included...
Members

Looking to Become a Member?

ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.

Webinars

These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.

Member Articles

Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.

Industry News

The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.

To get started, please let us know which of these best fits your current position: