The NACTT Academy offers a comprehensive community for bankruptcy professionals seeking to advance their education in consumer bankruptcy.
ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
Critical Case Comment
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Chapter 13 Trustee for the Middle District of Tennessee (Nashville)
In re Harris, 2014 WL 7385673 (Bankr. E.D. N.C. December 24, 2014)
An above-median income Chapter 13 debtor is only entitled to deduct from Current Monthly Income the lesser of actual home and vehicle payments or the corresponding standards promulgated by the IRS. (Doub)
Case Summary
Cydric and Pamela Harris filed a Chapter 13 petition in August of 2014. They were above-median income debtors but calculated that they had no Projected Disposable Income when they applied the . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
Creditors’ Rights and Debtors’ Protections at the Intersection of Consumer Bankruptcy and UCC Article 9
Substantial Contribution Claims
The Brunner Student Loan Hardship Test: Alive and Well in The Big Apple
Dollar Amount Increases in Bankruptcy Code
Six Things Taxpayers Should Know About the Sharing Economy and Their Taxes
Critical Case Comment–84 Months: Lifesaver or Anchor?
Department of Justice Guidance on Discharging Federal Student Loans in Bankruptcy Expanded to Include FFEL and Perkins Loans
Pump the Brakes: Bad Faith Debtors Are Not Gaming the System
To Conduit, Or Not To Conduit? That Is The Question. Or Less Shakespearean: “Conduit Mortgage Case Law”
From the Editor – Claims