The NACTT Academy offers a comprehensive community for bankruptcy professionals seeking to advance their education in consumer bankruptcy.
ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
From the Editor – Discharge Injunction
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired)
Creditor violated discharge injunction by filing proof of claim in subsequent Chapter 13 for debt discharged in Chapter 7. Affirming, the district court held that the creditor with a deficiency unsecured balance on a mobile home contract violated the discharge injunction in the Chapter 7 case when it filed a proof of claim in the debtors’ subsequent Chapter 13. The court rejected the creditor’s argument that mere filing of a proof of claim was not an act to collect or a discharge injunction violation, concluding that filing a . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
2019 Legislation Affecting Bankruptcy Practice
Why Address Formatting Is So Important for Jurisdiction
Critical Case Comment – Creditor Not Required to Dismiss Prepetition Nonbankruptcy Action
Passive Retention: A Creditor’s Right or an Act to Exercise Control?
The Uneasy Co-Existence of Federal and State Consumer Remedies in Bankruptcy Cases – the Fourth Circuit Weighs In
Herb Beskin – A Proclamation
Critical Case Comment – No Approval No Pay
ABI Commission on Consumer Bankruptcy – Collateral Repossessed Pre-Petition
Reaffirmations Impose Impossible Demands on Bankruptcy Counsel
Claim Preclusion and the Opportunities for Mischief