The NACTT Academy offers a comprehensive community for bankruptcy professionals seeking to advance their education in consumer bankruptcy.
ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
From the Editor – Discharge and Dischargeability
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired)
State’s Single Business Tax of defunct company was nondischargeable excise tax in former officer’s case. Michigan’s Single Business Tax owed by a defunct company, of which the Chapter 7 debtor had been an officer, was an excise tax under § 507(a)(8)(E), and the debtor’s derivative liability on that tax was excepted from discharge under § 523(a)(1)(A). “Because whether a tax is an ‘excise’ or not does not depend upon who is required to pay it, section 507(a)(8)(E)’s . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
Rollin’ Rollin’ Rollin’ – Whether a Motor Home Qualifies for the Homestead Exemption as a Mobile Home?
New Federal Guidance on Discharging Student Loans in Bankruptcy Is a Game Changer
Meet the New Trustee
Division of Marital Property During a Chapter 13 Bankruptcy
IRS Issues Standard Mileage Rates For 2019
From the Editor – Lien Issues
Retirement of the Honorable John E. Hoffman, Jr., Chief Judge
SBRA – The Sequel: Leases in Bankruptcy Under the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021
Small Business Reorganization Postscript 2
Deconstructing the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act: Obduskey Says Lawyers Conducting Nonjudicial Foreclosure Are Not “Debt Collectors”