The NACTT Academy offers a comprehensive community for bankruptcy professionals seeking to advance their education in consumer bankruptcy.
ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
From the Editor – Chapter 13 Issues
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired)
Effect of Confirmation: Disputed claim “provided for” by plan. The debtor and creditor had been involved in litigation for years, and the plan specifically stated that no payment of the disputed claim would be made, but that if the creditor prevailed in obtaining judgment and then filed a proof of claim, the plan would be amended to reflect the status. The nonbankruptcy litigation continued, and the plan was never amended, nor was a final amended proof of claim filed. The plan was completed, with no payment to this disputed . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
The Effect of “Success” (Or the Lack of It) on Attorneys’ Fees
Avoidance Powers in Chapter 13 – Part 5 of 6
Judge Carol A. Doyle: Pre-Retirement Interview
Brace & Beyond: Joint Tenancy & Transmutation
Hanging Paragraph, Cars for Non-Personal Use, and PMSI
Complete Termination of The Automatic Stay Under §362(c)(3)(A) According to the First Circuit
Escrow 101 – Part 2 of 3
From the Editor – Curing Default
Arbitration in Bankruptcy: Reading Opinions & Tea Leaves in Recent Supreme Court & Lower Court Actions
The Effect of “Success” (or the Lack of It) on Attorneys’ Fees – Part 1: Judicial and Legislative Background