The NACTT Academy offers a comprehensive community for bankruptcy professionals seeking to advance their education in consumer bankruptcy.
ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
Critical Case Comment
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Chapter 13 Trustee for the Middle District of Tennessee
In re Bradley, 2013 WL 3753559, *22, *23, *28, *50 (Bankr. S.D. Tex. July 16, 2013) (Bohm)
A debtor’s attorney, his firm and the owners of the firm would be individually sanctioned for filing documents without obtaining the debtor’s signature, verification, or authorization and for utilizing “appearance attorneys” in the representation of their clients.
Case Summary
In a long and comprehensive decision, Judge Jeff Bohm, the Chief Bankruptcy Judge of the Southern District of Texas, reviewed the methods by which an . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
ABI Commission on Consumer Bankruptcy – Collateral Repossessed Pre-Petition
Obtaining Credit in Chapter 13 – Did the Amendment to FRBP 4001(c) Eliminate Motions to Incur Additional Credit?
Ask Ms. Ps & Qs
Chapter 13 No-Look Fees
“Stripping” Residential Mortgages and the Effect of 11 U.S.C. § 1111(b) – Part 2 Eleven Eleven What?
Director’s Awards Recognize 19 Employees for Leadership, Service
From the Editor – Curing Default
Student Loans Debacle-Part II: Failure to Forgive – The Ticking Time-Bomb
Critical Case Comment – Present Tense in § 544(b)
Evidentiary Issues Arising from Attempts to Prove Alleged “Facts” Stated in The Monster Mash