The NACTT Academy offers a comprehensive community for bankruptcy professionals seeking to advance their education in consumer bankruptcy.
ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
Projected Disposable Income – Part 2
Print This Article
Link to Post:
After serving as the Associate General Counsel at LTV Steel in Cleveland Ohio, Judge Kay Woods was sworn in as United States Bankruptcy Judge on July 7, 2004 and sits in Youngstown in the Northern District of Ohio.
One of the BAPCPA issues that continues to divide authorities is whether 11 U.S.C. §.707 permits debtors to take the IRS Local Standard deduction when they may have a payment (i.e., a car or mortgage payment) lower than the Local Standard or no payment at all. Resolution of this expense question involves interpretation of the word “applicable” as . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
Critical Case Comment – Pro Se Debtor Sanctioned
Critical Case Comment – Prime vs. Riskless Treasury Rate
Post-Petition Equity in Chapter 13 – Who Gets The $$$
Fraud Imputed to Partner – Bartenwerfer v. Buckley
Delaware Trustee Michael Joseph to Retire
The Effect of “Success” (or the Lack of It) on Attorneys’ Fees Part 2: In re Village Apothecary, Inc.
Mary Ida Townson Appointed U.S. Trustee for Florida, Georgia, Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands
Arbitration in Bankruptcy: Reading Opinions & Tea Leaves in Recent Supreme Court & Lower Court Actions Part IV
The Extent of 362(c)(3)’s Stay Termination: Bankruptcy Court Adds an Argument to the Debate
Escrow 102 – Part 4 of 4