The NACTT Academy offers a comprehensive community for bankruptcy professionals seeking to advance their education in consumer bankruptcy.
ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
Critical Case Comment
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By Kevin R. Anderson, Chapter 13 Trustee for the District of Utah
Wells Fargo Home Mortgage v. Oparaji (In re Oparaji), --- F.3d ----, 2012 WL 4748957 (C.A.5 (Tex.)) (Clement).
In filing a postpetition arrearage claim under § 1305, the mortgage creditor is not required to include all postpetition arrearages. If the first bankruptcy case is dismissed and the debtor later refiles, the mortgage creditor is not judicially estopped from asserting arrearages in the second case that could have been asserted as postpetition arrearages in the first case.
Case Summary
In the first Chapter 13 case . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
No Answers?
Ask Ms. Ps & Qs
Ms. Ps & Qs
Memorial Day 2023
These Summer Activities Can Affect Next Year’s Tax Returns
Critical Case Comment – Service Counts
The Bankruptcy Moot Court Experience – Duberstein 2019
Creditors’ Rights and Debtors’ Protections at the Intersection of Consumer Bankruptcy and UCC Article 9 – Part IV
Critical Case Comment
Think Beyond The Means Test