The NACTT Academy offers a comprehensive community for bankruptcy professionals seeking to advance their education in consumer bankruptcy.
ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
Critical Case Comment: Sikes v. Crager
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Chapter 13 Trustee for the Middle District of Tennessee
Sikes v. Crager, 2011 WL 4591889 (W. D. La, Sept. 30, 2011) (Hicks)
A Chapter 13 plan proposing to pay only attorney’s fees and with little or no meaningful distribution to creditors is a plan not proposed in good faith.
Case Summary
Patricia Crager’s only source of income was Social Security and food stamps. She had four unsecured debt obligations totaling $7,855.27 and a monthly mortgage payment of $327.10. She filed a Chapter 13 petition, proposing to . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
Absolute Right to Dismiss? Sixth Circuit Says “Yes”
Passing of James J. Barta, Sr.
Teaching Old Dogs New Tricks: New Ideas for Treatment of Student Loans in Bankruptcy
What A Bankruptcy Lawyer Is Thankful For
ABI Commission on Consumer Bankruptcy – Statement of Intention: Deadlines and Consequences
From the Supreme Court
Critical Case Comment – In the Windfalls Category
Critical Case Comment – No Such Thing as “Technical” Violation of the Stay
I’ve Looked at Clouds from Both Sides Now
Leaders Must Take Action to Halt Foreclosure Crisis for Minorities