Claims: Transfers, Address Changes, and Payee Switches – Oh My!

In any given year Chapter 13 Trustees administer 400,000 to 500,000 cases and distribute almost $5 billion to creditors. A critical duty for trustees is to be sure that distributions are correctly delivered to an allowed claimant.

11 USC § 501 governs the filing of a proof of claim and 11 USC § 502 sets forth the requirements for allowance of claims. Fed.R.Bankr.P. 3001 and 3002 speak to form, content, and timing for filing claims. The rules . . .

It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.

Or sign in below:

The NACTT Emeritus Trustees

Former Chapter 13 Standing Trustees

The NACTT Emeritus Trustee Committee is made up of former Chapter 13 Standing Trustees from all over the country: Michael Joseph, Isabel Balboa, Carl Bates, S.J. Beaulieu, Carl Bekofske, Herb Beskin, Chuck DeHart, Pete Fessenden, Mike Fitzgerald, Barb Foley, Nancy Grigsby, Mary Grossman, Jan Hamilton, James Henley, Howard Hu, Jan Johnson, Jeff Kellner, Tom King, Debbie Langehenning, John Logan, Judge Brian Lynch (retired), Mike Macco, Mike Meyer, Bill Miller, Denise Pappalardo, Frank Pees, Jan Sensenich, George Stevenson, Jon Waage and Robert Wilson.

Towering Victory: UT Law Shines Bright with Third Duberstein Moot Court Championship

Debbie Langehennig

January 12, 2025

Trustee Deborah Langehennig lead University of Texas to its third national Duberstein championship. GO DEB!!!!

IRS Attempting to Collect on Virtual Currency

July 28, 2019

IRS has begun sending letters to virtual currency owners advising them to pay back taxes, file amended returns; part of agency’s larger efforts. On July 26th, the IRS announced that it has begun sending letters to taxpayers with virtual currency transactions that potentially failed to report income and pay the resulting tax from virtual currency transactions or did not report...

Critical Case Comment – Service Counts

Henry E. Hildebrand, III

October 2, 2022

Debtor’s filing application to extend or impose the automatic stay must comply with the service requirements of Rule 7004 as to all creditors or the stay cannot be imposed or extended. (Johnson) In re Hardy, 2022 WL 1196963 (C.D. Cal. April 21, 2022) Case Summary Kimberly Hardy had a long history in consumer bankruptcy. She had filed eight cases, including...

Members

Critical Case Comment – Fair Discrimination: A Win/Win

Henry E. Hildebrand, III

December 11, 2022

A Chapter 13 plan can be confirmed to pay a 100% dividend to unsecured creditors while maintaining payments to a student loan creditor as a long-term debt (which will not satisfy the student loan in the commitment period) without committing all available disposable income. (Mullin) In re Victoria Florita Durand-Day, 2022 WL 14938726 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. October 26, 2022) Case...

Members

After Chicago v Fulton: Not Only Cars – A Survey of Fulton Rulings and a Weakened Automatic Stay

Hale Andrew Antico

December 11, 2022

Intro: What is a Fulton ruling? When Chicago v Fulton (In re Fulton), 141 S Ct. 585 (Sup Ct, 2021) was first decided by the Supreme Court, there was a consensus among bankruptcy attorneys that the erosion of the automatic stay with regard to turnover was only about cars. That is, Fulton was a narrow ruling that was only about...

Members

Claim Preclusion and the Opportunities for Mischief

Cathy Moran

March 27, 2022

I’ve been having nightmares about the 9th Circuit’s decision in Siegel for 20 years. Broad strokes, Siegel (143 F.3d 525 (9th Cir. 1998) holds that a filed claim in a no asset bankruptcy case to which no one objects is entitled to preclusive effect in subsequent litigation by . . . It looks like you are not signed in or...

Members

Thoughts on Zealous Advocacy: When Do Bankruptcy Lawyers Cross the Line? Part III Practical Takeaways from Parts I and II

The Honorable Cynthia A. Norton, The Academy

July 26, 2026

Last week we published the second Part of Judge Norton’s article on Zealous Advocacy. Part I discussed the History of Zealous Advocacy, and Part II examined how courts have discussed zealous advocacy. Part III identifies Practical Takeaways from the article. In the following weeks, we will post Judge Norton’s extensive Addendum of reported cases on Zealous Advocacy.

Members

Unmet Installments Means Dismissal for Pro Se

Henry E. Hildebrand, III

August 18, 2024

Failure of a pro se debtor to pay the third installment of filing fees justifies dismissal of the case; debtor’s failure to submit a brief in compliance with Rule 8014 justifies a 180-day bar on refiling.

Members

Critical Case Comment – You Gotta Tell SOMEBODY!

Henry E. Hildebrand, III

December 18, 2022

Where a debtor fails to disclose to the Court or the trustee a forbearance on his mortgage that he was to pay directly, the Court would grant the trustee’s motion to modify to recapture as much as possible of the surplus funds the forbearance generated. (Kenney) In re Ilyev, 2022 WL 2965029 (Bankr. E.D. Va. July 26, 2022) Case Summary...

Members

Unscheduled Creditor May Not File a Late Proof of Claim

July 14, 2019

By Beverly M. Burden, Standing Chapter 13 Trustee (Lexington, KY) An unscheduled creditor without notice of the bankruptcy case was denied an extension of time to file a proof of claim pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 3002(c)(6)(A) in a recent opinion from the Eastern District of Kentucky. In the case of In re Fryman,1 the debtor did not include creditor Kentucky...

Members

Claims: Transfers, Address Changes, and Payee Switches – Oh My!

Link to Post:

It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.

Or sign in below:

The NACTT Emeritus Trustees

Former Chapter 13 Standing Trustees

Related Articles

Towering Victory: UT Law Shines Bright with Third Duberstein Moot Court Championship

IRS Attempting to Collect on Virtual Currency

Critical Case Comment – Service Counts

Critical Case Comment – Fair Discrimination: A Win/Win

After Chicago v Fulton: Not Only Cars – A Survey of Fulton Rulings and a Weakened Automatic Stay

Claim Preclusion and the Opportunities for Mischief

Thoughts on Zealous Advocacy: When Do Bankruptcy Lawyers Cross the Line? Part III Practical Takeaways from Parts I and II

Unmet Installments Means Dismissal for Pro Se

Critical Case Comment – You Gotta Tell SOMEBODY!

Unscheduled Creditor May Not File a Late Proof of Claim

Academy

Members

Website

Legal

Looking to Become a Member?

Webinars

Member Articles

Industry News

To get started, please let us know which of these best fits your current position: