The NACTT Academy offers a comprehensive community for bankruptcy professionals seeking to advance their education in consumer bankruptcy.
ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
Critical Case Comment
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Chapter 13 Standing Trustee for the Middle District of TN (Nashville)
In awarding attorneys’ fees in a Chapter 13 case, a court is not limited to establishing the fee by use of the lodestar method; fees for services rendered should be based on the reasonable and customary fees charged by other attorneys performing the same or similar work. (Johnson) In re Quiroz, 2019 WL 9244665 (Bankr. C.D. Ca. December 12, 2019)
Case Summary
Debtors’ counsel made an application for supplemental fees for opposing a motion for relief from the automatic . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
Cyber Security – You Are The Weakest Link
Bankruptcy Courts Grapple with the “COVID-19 Discharge” – Appendix B
Critical Case Comment – Fourth Circuit Says Easy-Peasy
The Gambling Debtor – What is a Chapter 13 Trustee to Do?
Why Creditors Should Get Less in Chapter 13
A Lasting Impact: My Participation in the Tom Vaughn Memorial Internship Program
Critical Case Comment – You Can’t Have Your Cake and Eat it Too
Absolute Right to Dismiss? Sixth Circuit Says “Yes”
In the Trenches: Secrets to Settlement – Competency in the Courtroom Part 2 of 3
Can a Secured Claim Still “Ride-Through” Bankruptcy Despite BAPCPA? Part 2: Looking Beyond In re Rhodes